Skip to content
Dossier
AssociateMentioned

ROBERT GLASSMAN

Court Filing

Jane's attorney

Mentioned in 8 documents. Roles: Jane's attorney, Witness, Counsel for victims, Attorney representing Jane in a civil case against Ghislaine Maxwell, Attorney for the Claimant

Nationality
Black Book
Not listed
Share
PostReddit

ROBERT GLASSMAN is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.

At a Glance

Click values for sources
0
Flight appearances
Document mentions
9 court | 1 DOJ
Known connections
1 strong | 13 weak
No
Black book entry
Evidence Types
Court Filing

Known Connections (20)

Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 14 shared document refe...
14D
The Government
The Government and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 8 shared document referenc...
8D
Nathan
ROBERT GLASSMAN and Nathan appear together in 6 shared document references....
6D
Jack Scarola
Jack Scarola and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 5 shared document references...
5D
The Court
The Court and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 5 shared document references....
5D
Ms. Jane
Ms. Jane and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 4 shared document references....
4D
Alison Nathan
Alison Nathan
Alison Nathan and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 8 shared document reference...
8D
The US Attorney
ROBERT GLASSMAN and The US Attorney appear together in 3 shared document referen...
3D
Defense counsel
ROBERT GLASSMAN and Defense counsel appear together in 2 shared document referen...
2D
David Parse
David Parse and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared document references....
2D
JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA
JEFFREY S. PAGLIUCA and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 3 shared document ref...
3D
Government
Government and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared document references....
2D
The victim
ROBERT GLASSMAN and The victim appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
The defendant
The defendant and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared document reference...
2D
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
DAMIAN WILLIAMS
DAMIAN WILLIAMS and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared document referen...
2D
Maurene Comey
Maurene Comey and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared document reference...
2D
Alison Moe
Alison Moe and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz
Lara Elizabeth Pomerantz and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared documen...
2D
ANDREW ROHRBACH
ANDREW ROHRBACH and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared document referen...
2D
Bradley Edwards
Bradley Edwards and ROBERT GLASSMAN appear together in 2 shared document referen...
2D

Document Mentions (17)

House OversightUnknown

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right t...

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, as a witness to testify about his advice to Jane regarding cooperating with the government and testifying against Maxwell. The attorneys contend that the attorney-client privilege does not apply or has been waived, and that Glassman's testimony is relevant to Jane's credibility and Maxwell's defense.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that th...

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an e...

The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an email is not admissible and requires additional context, and therefore refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony. The government had previously conferred with defense counsel on the matter. The letter is in relation to the ongoing case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an...

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an affidavit from David Parse regarding juror misconduct during his trial, while the second is a letter from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan discussing the anticipated testimony of attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Sc...

The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The letter, written by Kevin Boyle on behalf of witness Jane, argues that Jane's attorney, Robert Gl...

The letter, written by Kevin Boyle on behalf of witness Jane, argues that Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, should not be compelled to testify about his conversations with Jane because it would violate attorney-client privilege and be irrelevant to the case. The letter also argues that the subpoena served on Glassman was procedurally improper.

1p
House OversightUnknown

The letter, written by Jane's attorneys, opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to solicit testimony fr...

The letter, written by Jane's attorneys, opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to solicit testimony from Robert Glassman, arguing that it would disclose confidential information and is not relevant to the case. The attorneys request that the court deny Maxwell's motion to compel Glassman's testimony.

1p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 521

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, as a witness to testify about his advice to Jane regarding cooperating with the government and testifying against Maxwell. The attorneys contend that the attorney-client privilege does not apply or has been waived, and that Glassman's testimony is relevant to Jane's credibility and Maxwell's defense.

5p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Court Filing: 528

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.

8p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Court Filing: 541

The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an email is not admissible and requires additional context, and therefore refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony. The government had previously conferred with defense counsel on the matter. The letter is in relation to the ongoing case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

2p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Mixed court documents: 544

The provided document is a compilation of excerpts from two different court filings. The first is an affidavit from David Parse regarding juror misconduct during his trial, while the second is a letter from Jeffrey S. Pagliuca to Judge Alison J. Nathan discussing the anticipated testimony of attorneys Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman in the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell.

11p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Court Filing: 545

The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.

9p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Court Filing: 546

The US Attorney's Office requests redactions to Ghislaine Maxwell's letter motion and sealing of an exhibit to protect a minor victim's privacy, citing the Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. test. The proposed redactions are deemed narrowly tailored to protect the victim's privacy interests. The letter is submitted by the US Attorney's Office, signed by Damian Williams and several Assistant US Attorneys.

2p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 731-1

The letter, written by Kevin Boyle on behalf of witness Jane, argues that Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, should not be compelled to testify about his conversations with Jane because it would violate attorney-client privilege and be irrelevant to the case. The letter also argues that the subpoena served on Glassman was procedurally improper.

14p
Court UnsealedUnknown

Letter to the Judge: 731-2

The letter, written by Jane's attorneys, opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to solicit testimony from Robert Glassman, arguing that it would disclose confidential information and is not relevant to the case. The attorneys request that the court deny Maxwell's motion to compel Glassman's testimony.

3p

Showing 15 of 17 documents. View all →

This dossier on ROBERT GLASSMAN was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.