The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that th...
Summary
The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.
Persons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an e...
The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an email is not admissible and requires additional context, and therefore refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony. The government had previously conferred with defense counsel on the matter. The letter is in relation to the ongoing case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Court Filing: 528
The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.
Court Filing: 541
The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an email is not admissible and requires additional context, and therefore refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony. The government had previously conferred with defense counsel on the matter. The letter is in relation to the ongoing case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right t...
The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, as a witness to testify about his advice to Jane regarding cooperating with the government and testifying against Maxwell. The attorneys contend that the attorney-client privilege does not apply or has been waived, and that Glassman's testimony is relevant to Jane's credibility and Maxwell's defense.
The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Sc...
The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine...
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materials. The government defers to the MDC on the issue of laptop access on weekends and holidays, but notes that Maxwell has had extensive access to discovery materials. The government has provided a laptop for Maxwell's exclusive use and has made efforts to address technical issues with reviewing discovery materials.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.