Ms. Jane
alleged victim in the case
Mentioned in 29 documents. Roles: alleged victim in the case, victim/witness, Victim, Witness, Witness testifying under a pseudonym about her experiences in Epstein's house
Ms. Jane is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
court filing: 20-00830
“The document discusses the appeals court's decision in a case involving Maxwell, affirming the distr”
court filing: 22-1426, Document 79
“The document discusses the government's argument that the District Court's response to a jury note d”
Court Filing: 2221-42286
“The document discusses Ghislane Maxwell's appeal of her sentence, arguing that the evidence presente”
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 521
“The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right t”
Court Filing: 523
“The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for ”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 114 documents”
Known Connections (21)
Document Mentions (29)
court filing: 20-00830
The document discusses the appeals court's decision in a case involving Maxwell, affirming the district court's denial of a motion for a new trial and its response to a jury note regarding Count Four of the indictment. The court found that the district court did not abuse its discretion and that there was no constructive amendment or prejudicial variance from the indictment. The jury note concerned the interpretation of the second element of Count Four.
court filing: 22-1426, Document 79
The document discusses the government's argument that the District Court's response to a jury note did not constructively amend the indictment, and that the evidence presented at trial was consistent with the charges in Counts Three and Four of the Indictment. It also references relevant case law and trial testimony.
Court Filing: 2221-42286
The document discusses Ghislane Maxwell's appeal of her sentence, arguing that the evidence presented at trial was 'materially different' from the allegations in the indictment and that her sentence was procedurally unreasonable. The court disagrees, finding that Maxwell was not 'unfairly and substantially' prejudiced and that her sentence was reasonable. The court upholds Maxwell's sentence of 240 months' imprisonment.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 521
The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, as a witness to testify about his advice to Jane regarding cooperating with the government and testifying against Maxwell. The attorneys contend that the attorney-client privilege does not apply or has been waived, and that Glassman's testimony is relevant to Jane's credibility and Maxwell's defense.
Court Filing: 523
The document is a letter from the U.S. Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan, arguing for the admission of certain photographs from Jeffrey Epstein's New York house as evidence. These photographs are claimed to corroborate the testimony of a witness known as 'Jane' regarding her experiences in Epstein's house, particularly in the massage room where she alleges she was sexually abused. The government asserts that the photographs are relevant and should be admitted as they support Jane's testimony about the details of the massage room and Epstein's house.
Court Filing: 525
The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment are inadmissible due to lack of authentication and relevance, as they were taken in 2019, long after the alleged events. The defense argues that without testimony confirming the photos accurately depict the apartment during the relevant time period, they are irrelevant and potentially misleading. The court had previously sustained the defense's objection to the photos' admission.
Court Filing: 528
The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 547
The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony on the science of memory and suggestive questioning. The letter cites examples from witness testimony and government interviews, asserting that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony and undermine the defendant's right to a defense.
Court Filing: 704
The government opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to allow three defense witnesses to testify using pseudonyms or first names, arguing that it is unprecedented and not necessary to protect the defendant's constitutional rights. The government contends that the witnesses do not fit into established categories of witnesses who are permitted to testify anonymously, such as victims of sex abuse or undercover law enforcement officers.
Court Filing: 706
The government moves to preclude testimony from certain defense witnesses, including Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino, regarding their alleged participation in sexualized massages with Jane, arguing that it is irrelevant and improper impeachment. The government also seeks to preclude testimony from other witnesses, including Alexander Hamilton and Dr. Loftus, on various grounds.
Court Filing: 708
The prosecution responds to the defendant's letter regarding prior inconsistent statements, agreeing to stipulate to certain statements while objecting to others as inadmissible or cumulative. The letter outlines the applicable law and discusses specific statements, providing tables to clarify their positions on each statement.
Court Filing: 711
The document is a joint submission by the prosecution and defense in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, detailing their disagreements regarding the admissibility of prior inconsistent statements made by a witness, Jane. The parties discuss the application of FRE 613 and the impeachment of witness testimony. The document highlights the complexities of the trial and the challenges in determining the credibility of key witnesses.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 722
The letter, filed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, notifies the court and the government of the defendant's intention to present extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements made by witnesses Jane and Carolyn during their testimonies. The letter details specific inconsistencies between the witnesses' trial testimonies and their prior statements as recorded in 3500 materials.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 723
The defense attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell argues that the testimony of Eva Dubin, Michelle Healy, and Kelly Bovino is relevant, material, and exculpatory, contradicting Jane's testimony about group sexualized massages involving Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The defense asserts that excluding this testimony would violate Maxwell's right to present a defense and confront her accusers.
Court Filing: 731
The United States Attorney's office filed a letter with the court attaching two letters from Jane's counsel, with the agreement of all parties that they could be filed without redaction, in response to the court's July 13, 2022 Order.
Showing 15 of 29 documents. View all →
This dossier on Ms. Jane was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.