Skip to content
Dossier
AssociateMentioned

THE COURT

Court Filing

presiding judge

Mentioned in 34 documents. Roles: presiding judge, presiding judge in the case, Judge, Judge presiding over the case, Presiding Judge

Nationality
Black Book
Not listed
Share
PostReddit

THE COURT is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.

At a Glance

Click values for sources
0
Flight appearances
Document mentions
4 DOJ
Known connections
3 strong | 12 weak
No
Black book entry
Evidence Types
Court Filing

Known Connections (22)

Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein and THE COURT appear together in 10 shared document references....
10D
The Court
THE COURT and The Court appear together in 56 shared document references....
56D
Plaintiff
THE COURT and Plaintiff appear together in 10 shared document references....
10D
Donald Trump
Donald Trump
Donald Trump and THE COURT appear together in 4 shared document references....
4D
The Defendant
The Defendant and THE COURT appear together in 5 shared document references....
5D
Defense Counsel
THE COURT and Defense Counsel appear together in 5 shared document references....
5D
The defendant
THE COURT and The defendant appear together in 5 shared document references....
5D
The victim
THE COURT and The victim appear together in 4 shared document references....
4D
United States
THE COURT and United States appear together in 4 shared document references....
4D
Alan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz
Alan Dershowitz and THE COURT appear together in 8 shared document references....
8D
Alexander Acosta
Alexander Acosta
Alexander Acosta and THE COURT appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
Julie K. Brown
Julie K. Brown and THE COURT appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
the Defendant
the Defendant and THE COURT appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
The Government
THE COURT and The Government appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
Ron DeSantis
Ron DeSantis
THE COURT and Ron DeSantis appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
Government
THE COURT and Government appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell
Ghislaine Maxwell and THE COURT appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
Virginia Giuffre
Virginia Giuffre
Virginia Giuffre and THE COURT appear together in 2 shared document references....
2D
defendants
THE COURT and defendants appear together in 2 shared document references....
2D
Sting
Sting and THE COURT appear together in 3 shared document references....
3D
The Plaintiff
THE COURT and The Plaintiff appear together in 2 shared document references....
2D
Defense counsel
THE COURT and Defense counsel appear together in 2 shared document references....
2D

Document Mentions (56)

Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary (1)]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [2020.11%20DOJ%20Office%20of%20Professional%20Responsibility%20Report%20Executive%20Summary]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

EXHIBIT A [1332-16]

EXHIBIT A Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-16 Filed 01/08/24 Page 1 of 16 RICHARD D. EMERY ANDREW G. CELLI, JR. MATTHEW D. BRINCKERHOFF JONATHAN S. ABADY EARL S. WARD ILANN M. MAAZEL HAL R. LIEBERMAN DANIEL J. KORNSTEIN O. ANDREW F. WILSON ELIZABETH S. SAYLOR DEBRA L. GREENBERGER ZOE SALZMAN ...

1p
Dept. of JusticeDec 19, 2025

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE [(U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 1 Red Notebook (U) (NY-ERF#18399) Court Authorized Intercept-Doc#20-CRIM-21340Facility-917-520-3106 Disc#690612-R1 (U) (NY-ERF# 18727) Court Authorized Intercept Doc#20-CRIM-81211Facility-917-520-3106 Blu-Ray Disc#694397 (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 10 Photographs (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 17 Miscellaneous Financial Documents (U) (NY-ERF# 18309) Court Authorized Intercept Doc# 19-CRIM-29845156Facility-917-520-3106 Disc# 671455 (U) Recorded Interview (Non-Custodial - Overt) DTD 8/13/2019 with Holly Arace - Philadelphia (U) ONE RED ROPE CONTAINING: 1 Premier Day Planner " 2020.11 DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility Report Executive Summary]

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY OF REPORT Investigation into the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of Florida’s Resolution of Its 2006–2008 Federal Criminal Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein and Its Interactions with Victims during the I...

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Court denies amendment to add additional Jane Doe plaintiffs in CVRA case

The passage discusses procedural arguments about adding parties to a civil rights case and does not reveal any new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no Petitioners seek to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as parties but the court finds it unnecessary. Government argues Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was not known when a non‑prosecution agreeme T

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Court hearing on procedural motions with no substantive allegations

The excerpt consists solely of routine courtroom scheduling and brief procedural references, lacking any concrete allegations, names, transactions, or controversial actions involving powerful actors. The court set a hearing date for the 13th. Briefs were filed regarding a 'black book' issue and a prior motion involving Diane Flores. No substantive evidence or claims are presented.

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Deposition Copy Dispute Between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger

The excerpt details a procedural disagreement over copying documents for a deposition, with no mention of high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers minimal investigati Mr. Leopold requests laser‑color copies of identified documents for the deposition. Mr. Goldberger proposes sending copies to the court reporter instead of handling them directly. Both parties discus

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Courtroom exchange over handling of deposition photos and exhibit labeling

The passage records a routine procedural dispute among lawyers and a court reporter about copying deposition photos and attaching exhibit stickers. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, agencies, f Lawyers discuss copying deposition photos for the court reporter. Concern expressed about proper exhibit labeling before documents leave the room. Minor tension between attorneys over courtroom decor

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Court hearing on Maxwell's statements in Epstein-related case

The passage records a routine courtroom exchange about the credibility of statements made by Ghislaine Maxwell. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or novel allegations, off Discussion centers on whether Maxwell's statements about Virginia Giuffre are false. The court is focusing on the credibility of those statements for the jury. No new evidence, dates, or financial fl

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell

The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Court denies addition of new Jane Does in lawsuit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement

The passage reveals a procedural fight over standing to challenge Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, indicating ongoing litigation that could expose details of the deal. While it does not provide ne Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejects their

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated

The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential. He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaig Dershow

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Witness Testimony Blocked Over Attorney-Client Privilege in Epstein-Related Trial

The passage suggests that key testimony about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and possibly former President Clinton is being suppressed by invoking attorney‑client privilege, indi Attorney‑client privilege is being used to block questions about Epstein and Maxwell. The court previously barred non‑Fifth Amendment questions about Dershowitz. Reference to “Clinton” and “other wor

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Professor Alan Dershowitz seeks limited intervention in civil case, citing Fifth Amendment protections

The passage outlines a procedural filing by Dershowitz to intervene in a lawsuit and argues against adverse inferences from Fifth Amendment claims. It mentions no concrete financial flows, wrongdoing, Dershowitz files a motion for limited intervention to defend against alleged defamatory claims. The brief cites case law on adverse inference from Fifth Amendment assertions. If the court grants join

1p
House OversightNov 11, 2025

Call to Unseal Appellate Briefs on Manhattan DA's Handling of Epstein Case

The passage urges transparency and mentions the Manhattan District Attorney's abrupt change in stance on Epstein, but provides no concrete new evidence, transactions, or specific misconduct. It sugges Advocates for unsealing appellate briefs to reveal how prosecutors and the court handled the Epstein Notes the Manhattan District Attorney's sudden shift from a lenient position on Epstein. Proposes

1p

Showing 15 of 56 documents. View all →

Email Mentions (26)

Edward Rod LarsenJan 1, 2019

Re: Essays

Essay 1. Coming from an international background, and having lived in Oslo, Tel Aviv, New York and London by the age of eighteen, I believe that the i

Edward Rod LarsenOct 30, 2018

Essays

Essay 1. Coming from an international background, and having lived in Oslo, Tel Aviv, New York and London by the age of eighteen, I believe that the

Kia KokalitchevaJan 1, 2019

Pro Rata: Wednesday, February 21

Pro Rata By Kia Kokalitcheva •Feb 21, 2018 View in browser Welcome back, readers. Once again, a reminder to send me your delicious scoops and tips a

Hill, James E.Jan 1, 2019

inquiry re: Giuffre v Maxwell settlement

Good afternoon, Marty: This is James Hill at ABC News. Do you have any statement you wish to share on behalf of Mr. Epstein regarding the settlement

Frost, DannyJan 1, 2019

Re: request

Hi Sue — the document was filed under seal. I cannot violate the seal and provide it to you. (off the record please) You may wish to petition the cou

Frost, DannyJan 1, 2019

RE: request

Hi Sue, Regarding your first question: pursuant to Civil Rights Law § 50-b, our office’s practice in appellate sex crimes matters is to file document

Grant J. SmithJan 1, 2019

Sam Fields on 302 Interview

Broward Probe: 302 Reasons Not To Talk To The FBI BY SAM FIELDS Guest Columnist Actually, there are not 302 reasons. There is but one and it is called

Darren IndykeMar 14, 2019

Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html Jeffrey Epstein prosecutor was previously rebuked for handling of a child

Ross GowJan 1, 2019

Re: Daily Mail

Maz is the most devious and cunning of the bunch. However, Editors can pay for people, stories and documents. They can even pay criminals if it is in

Carolyn CohenJan 1, 2019

Statement for Press

Alan Dershowitz’s Statement: We can now prove that Jane Doe #3 has no credibility and lied about Clinton, the Gores and Dershowitz. Dershowitz’s lawy

Showing 10 of 26 emails. View all →

This dossier on THE COURT was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.