Skip to content
Case File
d-1691House OversightLegal Filing

The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an e...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1691
Pages
1
Persons
6

Summary

The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an email is not admissible and requires additional context, and therefore refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony. The government had previously conferred with defense counsel on the matter. The letter is in relation to the ongoing case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

Tags

Privilege issueAdmissibility of evidenceStipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 541

The US Attorney's office submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that a statement in an email is not admissible and requires additional context, and therefore refuses to enter into a stipulation regarding Robert Glassman's testimony. The government had previously conferred with defense counsel on the matter. The letter is in relation to the ongoing case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

2p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's access to discovery materials. The government defers to the MDC on the issue of laptop access on weekends and holidays, but notes that Maxwell has had extensive access to discovery materials. The government has provided a laptop for Maxwell's exclusive use and has made efforts to address technical issues with reviewing discovery materials.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed ...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding proposed redactions to certain reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests that certain information be redacted or sealed to protect the privacy interests of third parties and victims. The defense has indicated its position on the proposed redactions, and the government respectfully requests that the Court adopt the proposed redactions.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redaction...

The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan regarding redactions to reply briefs and exhibits in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The government requests redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy interests, which the court ultimately grants. The court also orders the parties to propose redactions or file Exhibit L of Reply Brief 6 on the public docket.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's office informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that neither the government nor the defense ...

The US Attorney's office informs Judge Alison J. Nathan that neither the government nor the defense seeks redactions to Exhibit L of Reply Brief 3, and it will be filed publicly. The letter is in response to the court's order regarding potential redactions. The case involves Ghislaine Maxwell.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The US Attorney's Office submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislain...

The US Attorney's Office submitted a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan updating the court on Ghislaine Maxwell's conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center. The letter details Maxwell's access to discovery materials, communication with her attorneys, and the search procedures in place at the MDC. The Government reports that Maxwell is receiving extensive accommodations, including 13 hours a day, 7 days a week to review discovery, and 25 hours a week of video-teleconference calls with her counsel.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.