Skip to content
Case File
d-8024Court UnsealedCorrespondence

Letter to the Judge: 731-2

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 731-2
Pages
3
Persons
5

Summary

The letter, written by Jane's attorneys, opposes Ghislaine Maxwell's request to solicit testimony from Robert Glassman, arguing that it would disclose confidential information and is not relevant to the case. The attorneys request that the court deny Maxwell's motion to compel Glassman's testimony.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 521

The letter, filed by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys, argues that Maxwell has a constitutional right to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, as a witness to testify about his advice to Jane regarding cooperating with the government and testifying against Maxwell. The attorneys contend that the attorney-client privilege does not apply or has been waived, and that Glassman's testimony is relevant to Jane's credibility and Maxwell's defense.

5p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 722

The letter, filed by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell, notifies the court and the government of the defendant's intention to present extrinsic evidence of prior inconsistent statements made by witnesses Jane and Carolyn during their testimonies. The letter details specific inconsistencies between the witnesses' trial testimonies and their prior statements as recorded in 3500 materials.

7p
Court UnsealedCorrespondenceUnknown

Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 731-1

The letter, written by Kevin Boyle on behalf of witness Jane, argues that Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, should not be compelled to testify about his conversations with Jane because it would violate attorney-client privilege and be irrelevant to the case. The letter also argues that the subpoena served on Glassman was procedurally improper.

14p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 525

The defense responds to the government's letter arguing that the '900 series photos' of Jeffrey Epstein's apartment are inadmissible due to lack of authentication and relevance, as they were taken in 2019, long after the alleged events. The defense argues that without testimony confirming the photos accurately depict the apartment during the relevant time period, they are irrelevant and potentially misleading. The court had previously sustained the defense's objection to the photos' admission.

9p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 528

The document is a letter from the US Department of Justice to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing that the defense's motion to call Jane's attorney, Robert Glassman, to testify should be denied due to attorney-client privilege and lack of probative value under Rule 403. The government asserts that Glassman's conversations with Jane are privileged and that the defense's theories for why the privilege does not apply are without merit.

8p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 545

The US Government filed a letter opposing Ghislaine Maxwell's request to call victim lawyers Jack Scarola, Brad Edwards, and Robert Glassman as witnesses, arguing that their testimony is irrelevant and would compromise attorney-client privilege. The Government contends that the victims themselves have already testified and been cross-examined, making the lawyers' testimony unnecessary. The court must decide whether to allow the defendant to call these lawyers as witnesses.

9p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.