MR. SHIECHTMAN
attorney
Mentioned in 52 documents. Roles: attorney, lawyer arguing before the court, attorney conducting direct examination, attorney conducting cross-examination, Defense Attorney
MR. SHIECHTMAN is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
“The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questi”
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
“The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the allege”
deposition: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 616-301 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 117
“The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Barry H. Berke, a partner at Kramer, Levin”
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
“Ms. Edelstein is cross-examined about a conversation with colleagues regarding a suspended lawyer wi”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
“This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 239 documents”
Known Connections (37)
Document Mentions (53)
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the alleged lack of candor by lawyers Brune & Richard and whether their actions were circumstantial evidence of a strategic decision to game the system.
deposition: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 616-301 Filed 02/24/22 Page 93 of 117
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of Barry H. Berke, a partner at Kramer, Levin, Naftalis & Frankel, who testified as a witness for defendant Parse. Berke provided details about his employment history and legal career. The testimony was given in a courtroom in the Southern District of New York.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
Ms. Edelstein is cross-examined about a conversation with colleagues regarding a suspended lawyer with the same name as Juror No. 1. She explains that they didn't bring it to the court's attention because they deemed it inconceivable that Juror No. 1 was the suspended lawyer. There was no discussion about raising a juror misconduct issue in a post-trial motion until after receiving a letter from Ms. Conrad.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
Court Transcript: 6152/20
The prosecution rests its case after submitting Government Exhibit 10 into evidence without objection. The defense then calls its first witness, Paul Schoeman, to testify.
Court Transcript: 6162/20
The document is a transcript of the testimony of Brune, a witness, during a court proceeding. Brune discusses the pre-voir dire stage, the analysis of juror information, and the team's knowledge of Catherine Conrad's prior suspension. The transcript includes direct, cross, and redirect examinations.
Court Transcript: 6163/20
The transcript captures the prosecution's argument that defendant Parse's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel is unfounded, as his defense team made strategic choices regarding Juror No. 1/Catherine Conrad, and that the evidence shows Parse was aware of and involved in the tax shelter transactions.
Court Transcript: 64432
The transcript is of a court proceeding where Ms. Edelstein is being questioned about her law firm's handling of information regarding Juror No. 1, including whether they would have disclosed it to the Court if not prompted. The discussion also touches on whether they considered raising it as an appellate issue.
Deposition transcript: A-5660
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning revolves around a letter Conrad wrote, focusing on the capitalization of 'our government' and Conrad's opinions about other individuals involved in the case. The testimony touches on Conrad's state of mind and potential biases.
court transcript: A-5669
The transcript details the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who apologized for misrepresenting herself during jury selection. The court discusses the implications of her testimony and decides to release her from an arrest warrant. The transcript also covers the scheduling of the trial and the testimony of other witnesses.
Court Transcript Index: A-5670
This is an index to a court transcript from the trial of Paul M. Daugerdas, detailing the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, as well as the receipt of various government and defense exhibits.
Court Transcript: A-5693
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It contains testimony from various witnesses and discussions between attorneys and the court. The transcript provides insight into the trial proceedings and the topics discussed during the hearing.
deposition transcript: A-5722
The document is a transcript of a deposition where Ms. Brune is questioned about her understanding of the significance of certain information regarding a potential juror and the steps she took or didn't take to verify this information. The questioning attorney presses Ms. Brune for her understanding and actions, with objections and comments from other attorneys and the court.
court transcript: A-5745
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where a witness, Brune, is being questioned about a conversation regarding a suspension opinion and whether certain individuals were informed about it. The witness is unsure if Ms. Edelstein asked to see the suspension opinion, but confirms that Ms. Trzaskoma informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about the issue on May 12th.
Showing 15 of 53 documents. View all →
This dossier on MR. SHIECHTMAN was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.