Shechtman
likely a lawyer or witness
Mentioned in 3 documents. Roles: likely a lawyer or witness, Witness or person being questioned, Prosecutor or attorney conducting cross-examination
Shechtman is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the allege...
“The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the allege”
The document is a court transcript discussing the case against Mr. Parse, with lawyers debating the ...
“The document is a court transcript discussing the case against Mr. Parse, with lawyers debating the ”
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
“The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the allege”
court filing: 616320
“The document is a court transcript discussing the case against Mr. Parse, with lawyers debating the ”
Deposition Transcript: A-5694
“The document is a transcript of a deposition taken on February 15, 2012, in the case of United State”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 56 documents”
Known Connections (12)
Document Mentions (18)
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the allege...
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the alleged lack of candor by lawyers Brune & Richard and whether their actions were circumstantial evidence of a strategic decision to game the system.
The document is a court transcript discussing the case against Mr. Parse, with lawyers debating the ...
The document is a court transcript discussing the case against Mr. Parse, with lawyers debating the defendant's involvement in obstructing the IRS and mail fraud. The defense distinguishes their case from an example given by Shechtman, arguing that Mr. Parse implemented instructions correctly initially. The prosecution references additional evidence detailed in their briefing.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 161 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and lawyer MR. SHECHTMAN regarding the alleged lack of candor by lawyers Brune & Richard and whether their actions were circumstantial evidence of a strategic decision to game the system.
court filing: 616320
The document is a court transcript discussing the case against Mr. Parse, with lawyers debating the defendant's involvement in obstructing the IRS and mail fraud. The defense distinguishes their case from an example given by Shechtman, arguing that Mr. Parse implemented instructions correctly initially. The prosecution references additional evidence detailed in their briefing.
Deposition Transcript: A-5694
The document is a transcript of a deposition taken on February 15, 2012, in the case of United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It contains testimony from a witness, likely Shechtman, who is being questioned by lawyers. The transcript covers various topics related to the case.
court transcript: A-5768
The document is a transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, discussing the investigation into Juror No. 1 and potential appellate issues. Brune testifies that his firm did not investigate Juror No. 1 further after the verdict. The witness denies attempting to 'sandbag' the court or plant error in the record regarding Juror No. 1.
court transcript: A-5833
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Berke by Mr. Shechtman, discussing Berke's investigation into Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer named Catherine Conrad. Berke confirms he didn't investigate further after agreeing with Ms. Brune that Catherine Conrad couldn't be Juror No. 1 based on voir dire. The witness is then excused, and the defense indicates they have no additional witnesses to call.
court transcript: A-5836
The court discusses scheduling for the submission of briefs with counsel, accommodating Mr. Okula's vacation and Mr. Shechtman's month-long trial, ultimately setting a deadline of March 23 for initial briefs.
court transcript: A-5837
The court transcript shows a discussion between the judge and counsel (MR. SHECHTMAN and MR. OKULA) regarding scheduling initial briefs, with dates set for March 23rd and April 5th. The judge adjourns the hearing, thanking counsel for their professionalism. The transcript ends with the court being adjourned.
Index of Examination: A-5838
This document is an index of examinations conducted during a court proceeding, listing witnesses and the attorneys who questioned them. It includes the names of witnesses Susan Brune, Laura Edelstein, Paul Schoeman, and Barry H. Berke, as well as attorneys Ms. Davis, Mr. Shechtman, and Mr. Okula. The document was prepared by Southern District Reporters, P.C.
court transcript: A-5904
The transcript records the oral argument on David Parse's motion for a new trial, with his attorney Paul Shechtman arguing that Parse received ineffective assistance of counsel. The court is familiar with the Strickland standard, a two-part test for determining ineffective assistance. Shechtman believes that if they reach the prejudice prong, they are likely to prevail.
transcript of a court hearing or deposition: A-5909
The court discusses Brune & Richard's lack of candor and its implications, with MR. SHECHTMAN arguing that it is circumstantial evidence of their realization of responsibility, not a strategic decision to game the system. The court considers whether this conduct indicates carelessness or a deliberate strategy.
court transcript: A-5910
The court expresses concern about a party's failure to disclose information and the subsequent proceedings to uncover the truth. The lawyer, Mr. Shechtman, acknowledges the issue and discusses the decision to turn over documents to the court.
transcript of a court hearing: A-5912
The transcript captures a discussion between the court and Mr. Shechtman about the effectiveness of Mr. Parse's counsel during his trial, the court's views on the likelihood of sentencing vs. trial, and the possibility of finding both a waiver of an impartial jury and effective assistance of counsel.
transcript of a court hearing or oral argument: A-5914
The document is a transcript of an oral argument where an attorney, Mr. Shechtman, is discussing the ineffective assistance of counsel and prejudice prong in a case involving multiple defendants and allegations of backdating. He argues that the government's case focused on backdating, but the evidence shows a more complex situation. The attorney compares his client's situation to that of another defendant, Mr. Brubaker.
Showing 15 of 18 documents. View all →
This dossier on Shechtman was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.