MR. DAVIS
Attorney conducting direct and redirect examination
Mentioned in 3 documents. Roles: Attorney conducting direct and redirect examination, Counsel for one of the parties, Prosecutor or Government Attorney
MR. DAVIS is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
deposition: A-5754
“The witness, Ms. Brune, is questioned about a letter submitted to the court in response to new facts”
deposition: A-5760
“Ms. Brune testifies that she attempted to be accurate in a submitted brief, but acknowledges it had ”
deposition transcript: A-5765
“Ms. Brune testifies about the potential misinterpretation of a brief due to its wording, and discuss”
Deposition or Trial Transcript: A-5769
“The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where Ms. Brune is being questioned by MR. DAVIS ”
Court Transcript: 6162/20
“The document is a transcript of the testimony of Brune, a witness, during a court proceeding. Brune ”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 14 documents”
Known Connections (4)
Document Mentions (5)
Court Transcript: 6162/20
The document is a transcript of the testimony of Brune, a witness, during a court proceeding. Brune discusses the pre-voir dire stage, the analysis of juror information, and the team's knowledge of Catherine Conrad's prior suspension. The transcript includes direct, cross, and redirect examinations.
deposition: A-5754
The witness, Ms. Brune, is questioned about a letter submitted to the court in response to new facts coming to light, and whether one of those facts was a suspension opinion she had previously found. The attorney conducting the deposition refers to a specific exhibit and asks Ms. Brune to confirm details about Ms. Trzaskoma's statement to the court.
deposition: A-5760
Ms. Brune testifies that she attempted to be accurate in a submitted brief, but acknowledges it had shortcomings. She denies that the brief contained material omissions, stating that it was not her intention to omit material information.
deposition transcript: A-5765
Ms. Brune testifies about the potential misinterpretation of a brief due to its wording, and discusses the conviction and acquittal of David Parse, expressing her belief in the jury's impartial verdict on the acquitted charges.
Deposition or Trial Transcript: A-5769
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding where Ms. Brune is being questioned by MR. DAVIS about Government Exhibit 28, a letter she wrote on July 21st. The exhibit is admitted into evidence without objection. The witness is then asked to review an attached Westlaw report.
This dossier on MR. DAVIS was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.