Theresa Trzaskoma
Person who had a discussion with Brune about Juror No. 1
Mentioned in 41 documents. Roles: Person who had a discussion with Brune about Juror No. 1, Person who related information to the witness, participant in the phone call with the Court, Individual whose knowledge of certain facts is being discussed, Partner in charge of jury selection detail work
Theresa Trzaskoma is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing...
“The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing”
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's par...
“The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's par”
The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation...
“The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation”
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brie...
“The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brie”
Court Transcript: 1616220
“The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 152 documents”
Known Connections (29)
Document Mentions (47)
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing...
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing due to its tone and content. They mention discussing the letter with their partner Randy Kim and connecting it to information previously shared by Theresa Trzaskoma.
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's par...
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's participation in a phone call with the Court. The witness did not discuss the call with Trzaskoma beforehand and is unsure if anyone else did. The testimony highlights potential issues with the firm's communication and candor.
The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation...
The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma and the accuracy of a statement regarding when the investigation began. Edelstein's testimony appears to be inconsistent, and they are pressed to clarify their answers.
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brie...
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' knowledge and investigation into Catherine Conrad. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of certain statements while also revealing her awareness of Theresa Trzaskoma's discovery of the Appellate Division suspension report.
Court Transcript: 1616220
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim and Brune. Brune's testimony focuses on her ethical obligations as an officer of the court and her actions regarding potential juror misconduct.
Deposition Transcript: 1620ser1003309
The witness discusses their reaction to receiving a letter from a juror, which they found disturbing due to its tone and content. They mention discussing the letter with their partner Randy Kim and connecting it to information previously shared by Theresa Trzaskoma.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 61102
The witness agrees that omissions can be considered lies and testifies about Theresa Trzaskoma's participation in a phone call with the Court. The witness did not discuss the call with Trzaskoma beforehand and is unsure if anyone else did. The testimony highlights potential issues with the firm's communication and candor.
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 61102/20
The witness is being questioned about their knowledge of certain facts and the drafting of a legal brief. They discuss their understanding of events and the reasoning behind the wording used in the brief. The testimony highlights potential discrepancies in interpretation and the context in which the brief was written.
Court filings and deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338
The document contains excerpts from court filings and a deposition transcript in Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal case, discussing topics such as the media's portrayal of Maxwell, witness testimony, and jury selection. The deposition focuses on Ms. Brune's testimony about her involvement in the case and interactions with other lawyers.
Court Filing - Exhibit List: 1:20-cv-00386-LPA
This document is a court filing listing various trial exhibits, including faxes, letters, emails, and memoranda, related to a case involving multiple defendants. The exhibits are referenced in relation to a motion for a new trial or evidentiary hearing concerning juror misconduct. The list includes correspondence between various individuals and entities.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03303-PAE
The deposition transcript shows Edelstein being questioned about their knowledge of an investigation conducted by Theresa Trzaskoma and the accuracy of a statement regarding when the investigation began. Edelstein's testimony appears to be inconsistent, and they are pressed to clarify their answers.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03308
The deponent discusses their conversation with Susan Brune about the brief, their level of knowledge regarding juror misconduct, and the editing process. They decided to focus on whether a suspended lawyer and a juror were the same person. The deponent ultimately edited the fact section of the brief.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03308-PAE Document 61602 Filed 02/24/22 Page 119 of 130
The deposition transcript shows Ms. Edelstein being questioned about statements made in a court brief, specifically regarding the defendants' knowledge and investigation into Catherine Conrad. Edelstein confirms the accuracy of certain statements while also revealing her awareness of Theresa Trzaskoma's discovery of the Appellate Division suspension report.
Deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-03339
The deposition transcript discusses the investigation into Juror No. 1's identity and the use of a Westlaw report. The witness confirms they had resources to investigate further but chose not to, and later called Nardello to assist in gathering information after receiving a juror letter.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
Showing 15 of 47 documents. View all →
This dossier on Theresa Trzaskoma was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.