MR. GAIR
Attorney/Prosecutor
Mentioned in 25 documents. Roles: Attorney/Prosecutor, Counsel for one of the defendants, Defense Attorney, Prosecutor/Attorney, Questioning attorney
MR. GAIR is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
Deposition Transcript: 120-ec1-00330-PAE
“The witness, Conrad, is being questioned about her husband's criminal history, which she allegedly c”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
“The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-00338-PAE
“The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where ”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
“This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from”
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cv-30033
“The document is a deposition transcript where Ms. Conrad is being questioned about her financial sit”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 114 documents”
Known Connections (20)
Document Mentions (25)
Deposition Transcript: 120-ec1-00330-PAE
The witness, Conrad, is being questioned about her husband's criminal history, which she allegedly concealed during voir dire. She is also questioned about her father's employment with the Justice Department and her own involvement in a disciplinary proceeding, which she failed to disclose.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-00338-PAE
The transcript documents Catherine Conrad's testimony in the case United States v. Daugerdas, where she is questioned about her previous statements and actions as a juror, and initially invokes her Fifth Amendment privilege before being granted use immunity.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
Deposition Transcript: 1:20-cv-30033
The document is a deposition transcript where Ms. Conrad is being questioned about her financial situation and credibility. She is asked about her cash on hand, stocks, and bonds, as well as her tax filing history. The questioning attorney attempts to challenge her credibility and financial disclosure.
court transcript: 1:20-cv-300380-PAE
The transcript records the cross-examination of Juror Conrad, who is questioned about her residence and potential misrepresentation during voir dire. Conrad admits to having two addresses, one in the Bronx and one in Westchester, and is challenged about her initial statement that she resided in Bronxville. The questioning also touches on her husband's criminal history and her father's role as an immigration judge.
Court Transcript: A-5634
The court discusses a request to close the courtroom during the testimony of Catherine Conrad, a witness, due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. Conrad is expected to assert her Fifth Amendment rights during testimony.
court transcript: A-5635
The transcript records a court proceeding where the defendant's attorney explains that they are calling witness Catherine Conrad, for whom the government is seeking immunity. The court allows the witness to be examined, and the direct examination begins. The defendant's attorney clarifies that they would have called the witness regardless, to avoid any misimpression that the government selectively granted immunity.
deposition transcript: A-5640
The document is a transcript of Conrad's deposition testimony, where they are questioned about their conduct in rejecting a subpoena, their medication, and their understanding of their rights during a hearing with Judge Pauley. Conrad's responses suggest a lack of clarity or cooperation, and the questioning attorney presses for specific details about their interactions with the judge and their financial situation.
court transcript: A-5646
The transcript shows a juror, Ms. Conrad, being questioned about her residence and personal life. She initially claimed to reside in Bronxville, Westchester County, but later admitted to living on Barker Avenue in the Bronx. The questioning attorney is trying to establish that she was dishonest during voir dire and potentially biased.
deposition transcript: A-5658
The document is a transcript of Rosa Conrad's testimony, where she is questioned about her communication with prosecutors after the trial, her use of different names, and discrepancies in her personal information. The questioning highlights potential inconsistencies and biases in her testimony.
Deposition transcript: A-5660
The document is a transcript of the direct examination of a witness named Conrad. The questioning revolves around a letter Conrad wrote, focusing on the capitalization of 'our government' and Conrad's opinions about other individuals involved in the case. The testimony touches on Conrad's state of mind and potential biases.
Deposition transcript: A-5665
The document is a transcript of a juror's cross-examination and redirect examination in a federal trial. The juror, Ms. Conrad, is questioned about her motivations for serving on the jury, her understanding of the trial instructions, and potential biases or influences on her decision-making. The testimony reveals that Ms. Conrad was a suspended New York attorney at the time of the trial and had filed a petition for readmission to the bar just before the trial began.
court transcript: A-5669
The transcript details the cross-examination of a witness, Ms. Conrad, who apologized for misrepresenting herself during jury selection. The court discusses the implications of her testimony and decides to release her from an arrest warrant. The transcript also covers the scheduling of the trial and the testimony of other witnesses.
Court Transcript Index: A-5670
This is an index to a court transcript from the trial of Paul M. Daugerdas, detailing the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, as well as the receipt of various government and defense exhibits.
Showing 15 of 25 documents. View all →
This dossier on MR. GAIR was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.