Court Transcript: 1616220
Summary
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim and Brune. Brune's testimony focuses on her ethical obligations as an officer of the court and her actions regarding potential juror misconduct.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Court Transcript: 6162/20
The document is a transcript of the testimony of Brune, a witness, during a court proceeding. Brune discusses the pre-voir dire stage, the analysis of juror information, and the team's knowledge of Catherine Conrad's prior suspension. The transcript includes direct, cross, and redirect examinations.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
Court Transcript: 2020-cr-00038
The transcript records the voir dire process for Juror No. 49 and Juror No. 50 in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The court and attorneys question the jurors to assess their ability to be fair and impartial, their background, and their understanding of the legal process.
Court Transcript: A-5634
The court discusses a request to close the courtroom during the testimony of Catherine Conrad, a witness, due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. Conrad is expected to assert her Fifth Amendment rights during testimony.
court transcript: A-5635
The transcript records a court proceeding where the defendant's attorney explains that they are calling witness Catherine Conrad, for whom the government is seeking immunity. The court allows the witness to be examined, and the direct examination begins. The defendant's attorney clarifies that they would have called the witness regardless, to avoid any misimpression that the government selectively granted immunity.
Court Transcript: A-5695
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It contains testimony, legal arguments, and rulings by the court. The transcript includes references to various witnesses and attorneys, including Sternheim.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.