Ms. Sterntheim
Witness who testified
Mentioned in 9 documents. Roles: Witness who testified, Counsel for Catherine Conrad, Defense Attorney, defendant's attorney, Witness or Attorney
Ms. Sterntheim is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
9 sources for document mentions
Court Transcript: 1616220
“The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim”
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
“The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request”
Court Transcript: 2020-cr-00038
“The transcript records the voir dire process for Juror No. 49 and Juror No. 50 in the case against M”
Court Transcript: A-5634
“The court discusses a request to close the courtroom during the testimony of Catherine Conrad, a wit”
court transcript: A-5635
“The transcript records a court proceeding where the defendant's attorney explains that they are call”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 36 documents”
Known Connections (11)
Document Mentions (9)
Court Transcript: 1616220
The document contains excerpts from a court transcript, featuring testimony from witnesses Sternheim and Brune. Brune's testimony focuses on her ethical obligations as an officer of the court and her actions regarding potential juror misconduct.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE
The transcript shows a discussion between the court and counsel regarding Catherine Conrad's request to close the courtroom during her testimony due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding.
Court Transcript: 2020-cr-00038
The transcript records the voir dire process for Juror No. 49 and Juror No. 50 in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The court and attorneys question the jurors to assess their ability to be fair and impartial, their background, and their understanding of the legal process.
Court Filing: 628
The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan opposing the defense's request to adjourn a hearing scheduled for March 8, 2022, citing the public interest in a speedy resolution and the availability of multiple defense attorneys. The government argues that an adjournment would delay the sentencing scheduled for June.
Court Filing: 63207
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team requested an adjournment of a hearing on her Motion for New Trial due to their unavailability. The court denied the request, citing that two of her four attorneys could attend and that the public interest favored a prompt hearing.
Court Transcript: A-5634
The court discusses a request to close the courtroom during the testimony of Catherine Conrad, a witness, due to concerns about her medical condition and disciplinary proceedings. The court denies the request, citing prior public disclosures and the defendants' right to a public proceeding. Conrad is expected to assert her Fifth Amendment rights during testimony.
court transcript: A-5635
The transcript records a court proceeding where the defendant's attorney explains that they are calling witness Catherine Conrad, for whom the government is seeking immunity. The court allows the witness to be examined, and the direct examination begins. The defendant's attorney clarifies that they would have called the witness regardless, to avoid any misimpression that the government selectively granted immunity.
Court Transcript: A-5695
The document is a transcript of a court proceeding in the case United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al. It contains testimony, legal arguments, and rulings by the court. The transcript includes references to various witnesses and attorneys, including Sternheim.
court transcript: Case 1:20-cv-03038-PAE Document 616-1 Filed 02/24/22 Page 24 of 67
The document is a transcript of a court hearing where Catherine Conrad is being questioned by Mr. Gair. The court discusses a financial affidavit and a voicemail message from Conrad stating she won't show up to the hearing. Conrad is then questioned about her previous statements regarding her financial situation during a hearing with Judge Pauley.
This dossier on Ms. Sterntheim was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.