Ms.Villaflana
Prosecutor in the USA v. Maxwell case
Mentioned in 18 documents. Roles: Prosecutor in the USA v. Maxwell case, Person whose response is referenced regarding an investigation, AUSA handling the Epstein case, Assistant US Attorney handling Epstein's case, USAO attorney involved in the negotiations and drafting documents
Ms.Villaflana is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
Court filings and transcripts: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
“The document contains a collection of court filings and transcripts related to the USA v. Maxwell tr”
Grand Jury Testimony Transcript: 203-3
“The transcript documents the grand jury testimony of a Special Agent involved in the investigation i”
Court Filing: 2:20-cv-00839-JES-MRM
“The document discusses the defendant's motion to compel the plaintiff to provide discovery informati”
Court Filing or Investigative Report: Case 22-1426, Document 77
“The document discusses the DOJ's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, detailing the organizational st”
court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023028
“The document details the FBI and USAO's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, including the defense te”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 46 documents”
Known Connections (9)
Document Mentions (20)
Court filings and transcripts: 1:20-cr-00330-PAE
The document contains a collection of court filings and transcripts related to the USA v. Maxwell trial. It includes an email from reporters opposing secret jury selection and excerpts from a witness testimony discussing the jury selection process. Additionally, it contains a timeline of key events for a Crime Victims' Rights Act analysis.
Grand Jury Testimony Transcript: 203-3
The transcript documents the grand jury testimony of a Special Agent involved in the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The testimony covers Epstein's background, details about the victims (Jane Does), and corroborating evidence such as telephone records and message pads. The Special Agent provides an overview of the evidence supporting the charges against Epstein.
Court Filing: 2:20-cv-00839-JES-MRM
The document discusses the defendant's motion to compel the plaintiff to provide discovery information or, alternatively, to stay the proceedings due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with discovery obligations. The plaintiff is claiming a non-existent 'investigative privilege' related to an alleged ongoing criminal investigation. The defendant argues that the information is necessary for adequate preparation for the plaintiff's deposition and other discovery matters.
Court Filing or Investigative Report: Case 22-1426, Document 77
The document discusses the DOJ's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, detailing the organizational structure of the DOJ and USAO, and the procedures followed in the Epstein case. It highlights the involvement of various individuals, including AUSAs and Epstein's lawyers, and their interactions during the investigation. The document appears to be part of a larger report or court filing related to the Epstein case.
court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023028
The document details the FBI and USAO's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, including the defense team's efforts to influence the outcome and Acosta's decision to offer a plea deal. It outlines the key events and interactions between the parties from May 2006 to July 2007. The document appears to be a factual account from an official report or court filing.
court filing or legal document related to a case involving Jeffrey Epstein: DOJ-OGR-00023029
The document details the negotiations between the USAO and Epstein's defense team, including the proposed terms of a plea agreement and the involvement of key individuals. The negotiations involved multiple meetings and exchanges, with the USAO ultimately proposing a deal that included a two-year term of incarceration. The parties continued to negotiate, with the term of imprisonment being reduced over time.
Court document or legal filing, likely part of a larger report or appendix: DOJ-OGR-00023030
The document outlines the negotiations and challenges related to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), including disagreements over terms such as sexual offender registration and monetary damages for victims. It details the interactions between prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, including Lefkowitz, Sloman, and Starr. The NPA's signing and subsequent disputes are covered, along with the Department's review of the case.
Court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023034
This chapter discusses the government's interactions with victims during the Epstein investigation, focusing on their interpretation of the CVRA and their notification practices. It highlights the roles of various officials and the concerns raised about consulting victims during plea discussions. The document provides a detailed factual background on these issues.
court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023035
The document details the events surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case in 2007-2008, including investigations, victim notifications, and the handling of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It outlines the communications between prosecutors, investigators, and defense attorneys, and the steps taken to prepare for potential prosecution.
Report or Investigation Document: DOJ-OGR-00023036
The document outlines the timeline and actions taken regarding CVRA litigation, victim notification letters, and relevant statutory provisions and department policies. It analyzes whether certain actions violated clear standards and discusses the implications of victim notification letters sent by the FBI.
Court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023037
The document appears to be a report or court filing analyzing the Department of Justice's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, focusing on the notification of victims and the professional conduct of DOJ officials. It concludes that while some decisions did not violate clear standards, they demonstrated poor judgment. The report also criticizes the government's treatment of victims, stating that they were not treated forthrightly or with sensitivity.
Summary or Timeline Document: DOJ-OGR-00023045
This document summarizes the USAO's roles and responsibilities during the Epstein investigation from 2006 to 2009 and lists key events, including the opening of the federal investigation, signing of the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), and Epstein's guilty plea and release.
Timeline: DOJ-OGR-00023050
The timeline documents the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008, highlighting key events such as the drafting of a prosecution memorandum, meetings with Epstein's counsel, and the eventual signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The timeline also reveals the involvement of various officials, including Acosta, Sloman, and Lourie. The events documented in the timeline ultimately led to Epstein's state-based plea deal and sentencing.
court document or deposition transcript: DOJ-OGR-00023069
The document discusses internal USAO emails and interviews regarding the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case, including disagreements about meeting with his defense counsel and prosecution strategy. USAO officials Lourie, Menchel, and Villafaña had differing opinions on whether to meet with Epstein's lawyers. The document provides insight into the USAO's decision-making process in the Epstein case.
Investigative report or deposition summary: DOJ-OGR-00023077
The document discusses the reasoning behind the decision-making process in the Jeffrey Epstein case, including the preference for a state-based resolution due to the novelty of trafficking prosecutions and concerns about federal judges' receptiveness to certain plea agreements. It highlights the complexities and uncertainties faced by prosecutors at the time.
Showing 15 of 20 documents. View all →
This dossier on Ms.Villaflana was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.