Mr. Sloman
Likely another defense attorney or representative for Epstein
Mentioned in 7 documents. Roles: Likely another defense attorney or representative for Epstein, USAO official informed by Villafaña about victim consultation, First Assistant United States Attorney, Assistant U.S. Attorney who worked on the Epstein case, USAO representative
Mr. Sloman is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
8 sources for document mentions
Court Document/Investigative Report: SA-116
“The document discusses a breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz in 2007, which drew criticis”
Court document or legal filing, likely part of a larger report or appendix: DOJ-OGR-00023030
“The document outlines the negotiations and challenges related to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution A”
Court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023034
“This chapter discusses the government's interactions with victims during the Epstein investigation, ”
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023119
“The document discusses the negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, particu”
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023132
“The document details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea, including his attorneys' efforts t”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 23 documents”
Known Connections (5)
Document Mentions (8)
Court document or legal filing, likely part of a larger report or appendix: DOJ-OGR-00023030
The document outlines the negotiations and challenges related to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), including disagreements over terms such as sexual offender registration and monetary damages for victims. It details the interactions between prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, including Lefkowitz, Sloman, and Starr. The NPA's signing and subsequent disputes are covered, along with the Department's review of the case.
Court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023034
This chapter discusses the government's interactions with victims during the Epstein investigation, focusing on their interpretation of the CVRA and their notification practices. It highlights the roles of various officials and the concerns raised about consulting victims during plea discussions. The document provides a detailed factual background on these issues.
Timeline: DOJ-OGR-00023050
The timeline documents the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008, highlighting key events such as the drafting of a prosecution memorandum, meetings with Epstein's counsel, and the eventual signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The timeline also reveals the involvement of various officials, including Acosta, Sloman, and Lourie. The events documented in the timeline ultimately led to Epstein's state-based plea deal and sentencing.
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023119
The document discusses the negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, particularly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the sexual offender registration requirement. It reveals that the USAO was adamant that Epstein register as a sex offender, while Epstein's team attempted to negotiate this term. The document also sheds light on the reasoning behind the non-prosecution provision and its potential implications.
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023132
The document details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea, including his attorneys' efforts to appeal to senior Department of Justice officials to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Despite multiple communications, the plea was eventually scheduled for January 4, 2008.
Timeline: DOJ-OGR-00023228
The document outlines key events in the Jeffrey Epstein case, focusing on victim notification, consultation, and the application of the CVRA. It highlights interactions between prosecutors, FBI agents, and victims, as well as significant dates in the case's progression and subsequent legal actions.
Court Document/Investigative Report: SA-116
The document discusses a breakfast meeting between Acosta and Lefkowitz in 2007, which drew criticism when it became public. The meeting was perceived as evidence of secret agreements or preferential treatment for Epstein. The document analyzes letters exchanged between Acosta and Lefkowitz, revealing discrepancies in their accounts of the meeting.
Alleged DOJ interference and delayed review in Jeffrey Epstein prosecution
The passage suggests possible internal DOJ/USAO obstruction of the review process in the Epstein case, naming specific DOJ staff (Mr. Sloman, Mr. Lefkowitz, Mr. Acosta) and indicating a pattern of del Mr. Sloman allegedly re‑imposed a timetable to thwart a defense request to the Deputy Attorney Gener Emails between Mr. Lefkowitz and Mr. Acosta on Feb. 25‑29, 2008, discuss limiting the review proce
This dossier on Mr. Sloman was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.