Lourie
AUSA involved in the Epstein case
Mentioned in 6 documents. Roles: AUSA involved in the Epstein case, Prosecutor on the Epstein case, USAO official involved in discussions about Epstein's case, Assistant U.S. Attorney involved in the Epstein case, Principal Deputy and Chief of Staff to Alice Fisher
Lourie is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
Prosecutors Misrepresented Victim Count and Confidentiality in Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement
2025-11-11
“The passage details alleged prosecutorial misconduct—inflated victim numbers, false assurances of co”
Court Filing or Investigative Report: Case 22-1426, Document 77
“The document discusses the DOJ's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, detailing the organizational st”
Timeline: DOJ-OGR-00023050
“The timeline documents the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008,”
court document or deposition transcript: DOJ-OGR-00023069
“The document discusses internal USAO emails and interviews regarding the handling of Jeffrey Epstein”
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023119
“The document discusses the negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, particu”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 23 documents”
Known Connections (6)
Document Mentions (7)
Prosecutors Misrepresented Victim Count and Confidentiality in Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Agreement
The passage details alleged prosecutorial misconduct—inflated victim numbers, false assurances of confidentiality, and internal emails involving U.S. Attorney Alejandro Acosta, Deputy U.S. Attorney An AUSA Villafana claimed 40 minor victims in September 2007, later reduced to 34 confirmed minors plus Villafana communicated directly with senior officials (Acosta, Lourie, Garcia) about keeping the N
Court Filing or Investigative Report: Case 22-1426, Document 77
The document discusses the DOJ's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein, detailing the organizational structure of the DOJ and USAO, and the procedures followed in the Epstein case. It highlights the involvement of various individuals, including AUSAs and Epstein's lawyers, and their interactions during the investigation. The document appears to be part of a larger report or court filing related to the Epstein case.
Timeline: DOJ-OGR-00023050
The timeline documents the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008, highlighting key events such as the drafting of a prosecution memorandum, meetings with Epstein's counsel, and the eventual signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The timeline also reveals the involvement of various officials, including Acosta, Sloman, and Lourie. The events documented in the timeline ultimately led to Epstein's state-based plea deal and sentencing.
court document or deposition transcript: DOJ-OGR-00023069
The document discusses internal USAO emails and interviews regarding the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case, including disagreements about meeting with his defense counsel and prosecution strategy. USAO officials Lourie, Menchel, and Villafaña had differing opinions on whether to meet with Epstein's lawyers. The document provides insight into the USAO's decision-making process in the Epstein case.
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023119
The document discusses the negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, particularly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the sexual offender registration requirement. It reveals that the USAO was adamant that Epstein register as a sex offender, while Epstein's team attempted to negotiate this term. The document also sheds light on the reasoning behind the non-prosecution provision and its potential implications.
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023132
The document details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea, including his attorneys' efforts to appeal to senior Department of Justice officials to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Despite multiple communications, the plea was eventually scheduled for January 4, 2008.
Court Document or Investigative Report: DOJ-OGR-00023194
The document outlines a series of meetings between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, detailing the topics discussed and the participants involved. It highlights the key events and negotiations leading up to the signing of the NPA and subsequent state plea agreement. The document appears to be part of a larger investigative report or court filing.
Email Mentions (2)
Epstein prosecutor was rebuked for prior child sex case I Miami Herald
https://www.miamiherald.com/news/politics-government/article226765309.html Jeffrey Epstein prosecutor was previously rebuked for handling of a child
Re: Epstein agreement as reviewed by the U.S. Attorney
Marie - Here are what I hope are final edits to the agreement. I will call in 15 min. thanks -- Jay
This dossier on Lourie was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.