Court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023034
Summary
This chapter discusses the government's interactions with victims during the Epstein investigation, focusing on their interpretation of the CVRA and their notification practices. It highlights the roles of various officials and the concerns raised about consulting victims during plea discussions. The document provides a detailed factual background on these issues.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
Timeline: DOJ-OGR-00023050
The timeline documents the federal investigation into Jeffrey Epstein from May 2006 to October 2008, highlighting key events such as the drafting of a prosecution memorandum, meetings with Epstein's counsel, and the eventual signing of a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The timeline also reveals the involvement of various officials, including Acosta, Sloman, and Lourie. The events documented in the timeline ultimately led to Epstein's state-based plea deal and sentencing.
Court document or legal filing, likely part of a larger report or appendix: DOJ-OGR-00023030
The document outlines the negotiations and challenges related to Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA), including disagreements over terms such as sexual offender registration and monetary damages for victims. It details the interactions between prosecutors, including Acosta and Villafaña, and Epstein's defense team, including Lefkowitz, Sloman, and Starr. The NPA's signing and subsequent disputes are covered, along with the Department's review of the case.
Court filing or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023037
The document appears to be a report or court filing analyzing the Department of Justice's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein case, focusing on the notification of victims and the professional conduct of DOJ officials. It concludes that while some decisions did not violate clear standards, they demonstrated poor judgment. The report also criticizes the government's treatment of victims, stating that they were not treated forthrightly or with sensitivity.
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023119
The document discusses the negotiations between the USAO and Jeffrey Epstein's defense team, particularly regarding the non-prosecution agreement and the sexual offender registration requirement. It reveals that the USAO was adamant that Epstein register as a sex offender, while Epstein's team attempted to negotiate this term. The document also sheds light on the reasoning behind the non-prosecution provision and its potential implications.
court document or investigative report: DOJ-OGR-00023132
The document details the delays in Jeffrey Epstein's guilty plea, including his attorneys' efforts to appeal to senior Department of Justice officials to set aside the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). Despite multiple communications, the plea was eventually scheduled for January 4, 2008.
court document or deposition transcript: DOJ-OGR-00023069
The document discusses internal USAO emails and interviews regarding the handling of Jeffrey Epstein's case, including disagreements about meeting with his defense counsel and prosecution strategy. USAO officials Lourie, Menchel, and Villafaña had differing opinions on whether to meet with Epstein's lawyers. The document provides insight into the USAO's decision-making process in the Epstein case.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.