Skip to content
Case File
d-16256House OversightOther

Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011305
Pages
1
Persons
7

Summary

The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

jeffrey-epsteincourt-transcriptghislaine-maxwelldefamationsexual-abuselegal-exposurehouse-oversightsexual-misconduct
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court hearing references alleged sexual abuse claims involving Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein

The excerpt hints at undisclosed allegations and potential falsehood disputes in a civil case involving high‑profile figures (Maxwell and Epstein). While it does not provide concrete evidence, dates, The plaintiff alleges abuse by the defendant and Jeffrey Epstein while a minor. The defense claims the plaintiff’s allegations are false. Reference to “Churcher articles” and an omnibus motion sugges

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court hearing on admissibility of defendant's statement regarding defamation claim

The passage is a routine courtroom exchange about evidentiary motions with no specific names, dates, financial details, or high‑level actors. It offers minimal investigative value beyond confirming a Defendant's counsel attempted to attribute a statement to the defendant's lawyer and press agent. The court is considering whether the statement shows the defendant's state of mind and ownership of

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court denies addition of new Jane Doe plaintiffs in suit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement

The passage reveals a pending civil action that challenges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and mentions additional alleged victims (Jane Doe 3 and 4). While it does not provide new factual Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejected adding these

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Witness Testimony Blocked Over Attorney-Client Privilege in Epstein-Related Trial

The passage suggests that key testimony about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and possibly former President Clinton is being suppressed by invoking attorney‑client privilege, indi Attorney‑client privilege is being used to block questions about Epstein and Maxwell. The court previously barred non‑Fifth Amendment questions about Dershowitz. Reference to “Clinton” and “other wor

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court hearing references alleged accusations involving world leaders and Alan Dershowitz in a sexual‑abuse case

The passage hints at a claim that a plaintiff’s statement links high‑profile figures (unspecified world leaders and Alan Dershowitz) to alleged wrongdoing, suggesting a possible foreign‑influence or e Plaintiff’s statement reportedly mentions "world leaders" and Alan Dershowitz as part of alleged lie Defense counsel argues the plaintiff would lose if she cannot prove Maxwell’s role. The court appe

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Potential Deposition of Bill Clinton Linked to Epstein Case

The passage reveals that plaintiff counsel intends to depose former President Bill Clinton due to alleged connections with Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, including claims of shared travel and Edwards' counsel plans to subpoena Bill Clinton's deposition in the Epstein civil litigation. Clinton is described as a friend of Ghislaine Maxwell, who allegedly facilitated Epstein's abuse. Clinton

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.