Schulte
defendant
Mentioned in 15 documents. Roles: defendant, plaintiff or movant, defendant in the case, defendant making the challenge, defendant making claims about Jury Plan's constitutionality
Schulte is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
Schulte Research memo linking Koch Industries, Trump administration officials, and Chinese fintech investments
2025-11-11
“The memo provides a detailed network of alleged financial and advisory ties between Koch Brothers, s”
Schulte Research memo linking Chinese fintech H‑shares (Ping An, CICC) to Trump cabinet members and suggesting investment angles
2025-11-11
“The memo hints at possible connections between Trump administration appointees and Chinese financial”
Email chain referencing Schulte Research on PRC fintech ownership ties to Trump cabinet members
2025-11-11
“The passage hints at a research project linking Chinese financial technology firms to members of the”
Schulte Research memo links Koch Industries, Trump administration officials, and Chinese fintech firms to coordinated investment and policy strategies
2025-11-11
“The passage provides a detailed, albeit unverified, mapping of relationships between the Koch networ”
The defendant, Joshua Adam Schulte, a former CIA employee, moves to dismiss the third superseding in...
“The defendant, Joshua Adam Schulte, a former CIA employee, moves to dismiss the third superseding in”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 49 documents”
Known Connections (9)
Document Mentions (25)
Schulte Research memo linking Koch Industries, Trump administration officials, and Chinese fintech investments
The memo provides a detailed network of alleged financial and advisory ties between Koch Brothers, senior Trump cabinet members (e.g., Pence, Pompeo, Tillerson, McGahn) and Chinese fintech giants, sug Koch Industries allegedly funds Freedom Partners, which employs Marc Short (former chief of staff to Don McGahn, White House Counsel, reportedly raised >$100M for Freedom Partners. Mike Pompeo’s camp
Schulte Research memo linking Chinese fintech H‑shares (Ping An, CICC) to Trump cabinet members and suggesting investment angles
The memo hints at possible connections between Trump administration appointees and Chinese financial firms tied to the Koch brothers and oil/gas interests, but provides no concrete names, transactions Ping An and CICC are identified as key H‑share holders in Alibaba/Tencent ecosystem. Ping An owns 44% of Lufax and has management linked to WeBank. CICC and its breakaway CDH invested in Zhong An and
Email chain referencing Schulte Research on PRC fintech ownership ties to Trump cabinet members
The passage hints at a research project linking Chinese financial technology firms to members of the Trump administration, but provides no concrete names, transactions, dates, or documents. It suggest Subject line mentions "Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership" Sender Gino Yu is coordinating a meeting in NYC with an unnamed benefactor Paul Schulte is identified as Fou
Schulte Research memo links Koch Industries, Trump administration officials, and Chinese fintech firms to coordinated investment and policy strategies
The passage provides a detailed, albeit unverified, mapping of relationships between the Koch network, senior Trump cabinet members (Trump, Pence, Pompeo, McGahn, DeVos), and Chinese fintech giants (P Koch Brothers’ political network (Freedom Partners, Americans for Prosperity, etc.) allegedly funded Trump and Pence staffers are described as former Koch employees, suggesting direct pipeline of inf
The defendant, Joshua Adam Schulte, a former CIA employee, moves to dismiss the third superseding in...
The defendant, Joshua Adam Schulte, a former CIA employee, moves to dismiss the third superseding indictment on the grounds that the grand jury venire did not reflect a fair cross-section of the community. The court denies the motion, rejecting Schulte's claims under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968. The case involves charges related to stealing national defense information and transmitting it to Wikileaks.
The Government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, referencing a recent decision by Judge Cr...
The Government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, referencing a recent decision by Judge Crotty in United States v. Schulte, which rejected a similar Sixth Amendment claim. The Government argues that Judge Crotty's decision supports their position in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The letter outlines the key findings from Judge Crotty's decision.
The document discusses Schulte's motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that it was obtaine...
The document discusses Schulte's motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that it was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights and the JSSA, due to issues with the jury selection process in the White Plains courthouse. The court provides background on the District's jury selection plan and the defendant's claims. The motion is based on alleged underrepresentation of African American and Hispanic American populations in the grand jury venire.
The court denies Schulte's motion to dismiss, concluding that Schulte has not demonstrated a plausib...
The court denies Schulte's motion to dismiss, concluding that Schulte has not demonstrated a plausible violation of the JSSA. The court found that the violation was technical and did not have a substantial effect. The case will proceed as a result of this order.
Court Opinion & Order: 17-Cr-548
The defendant, Joshua Adam Schulte, a former CIA employee, moves to dismiss the third superseding indictment on the grounds that the grand jury venire did not reflect a fair cross-section of the community. The court denies the motion, rejecting Schulte's claims under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments and the Jury Selection and Service Act of 1968. The case involves charges related to stealing national defense information and transmitting it to Wikileaks.
Court Filing: 185
The Government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan, referencing a recent decision by Judge Crotty in United States v. Schulte, which rejected a similar Sixth Amendment claim. The Government argues that Judge Crotty's decision supports their position in the Ghislaine Maxwell case. The letter outlines the key findings from Judge Crotty's decision.
court filing: 20-cr-17-00388
The document discusses Schulte's motion to dismiss the indictment on the grounds that it was obtained in violation of his constitutional rights and the JSSA, due to issues with the jury selection process in the White Plains courthouse. The court provides background on the District's jury selection plan and the defendant's claims. The motion is based on alleged underrepresentation of African American and Hispanic American populations in the grand jury venire.
court filing: 20-cv-00854
The court denies Schulte's motion to dismiss, concluding that Schulte has not demonstrated a plausible violation of the JSSA. The court found that the violation was technical and did not have a substantial effect. The case will proceed as a result of this order.
court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00365-DLC Document 1859 Filed 03/24/21 Page 20 of 20
The document discusses the court's decision on defining the relevant jury pool and community for Schulte's trial, agreeing with the Government that the northern counties from which White Plains draws jurors represent the relevant community.
court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00383-PAC Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 18 of 20
The court rejects Schulte's Equal Protection claim and JSSA claims, finding no evidence of intentional discrimination and no substantial failure to comply with the JSSA. The court also dismisses Schulte's Sixth Amendment fair cross-section challenge.
court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00383-PAC Document 855-1 Filed 03/22/21 Page 12 of 20
The document argues that it is constitutional to indict a defendant in one courthouse and try them in another within the same district, citing precedent and the COVID-19 pandemic as justification. The court is unpersuaded by Schulte's allegations challenging this practice. The document discusses the flexibility of venue requirements in the context of grand jury proceedings.
Showing 15 of 25 documents. View all →
Email Mentions (19)
Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
CONTACT US Paul Schulte DEEP DIVES INTO PRC FIN TECH OWNERSHIP AND TRUMP CABINET OWNERSHIP. (DO NOT FORWARD) Gavin Liu Senior Analyst * H SHARES: P
Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
Founder and Editor Schulte Research
Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
I’m Still in HK. Cancelled my India trip. Leaving for Italy on Monday. Can meet this weekend if you are around. Can I forward this to my benefactor i
Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
Sure. Forward
Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
See the attached. Let me know if you are interested in meeting him when he’s in NYC. gino
Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
no ,. how are you?
Re: Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
Good. Sorting out Tulum at the moment. Over 40 people wanted to come. The Cenote project didn’t get funded yet so we are sorting out accommodations. D
Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
SCHULTE RESEARCH REPORT: ED 164 .41114 DEEP DIVES INTO PRC FIN TECH OWNERSHIP AND TRUMP CABINET OWNERSHIP. (DO NOT FORWARD) 12 December 2016 ED 164 •
Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
Founder and Editor Schulte Research
Schulte Research: Deep dives into PRC fin tech ownership and Trump cabinet ownership. (DO NOT FORWARD)
I'm Still in HK. Cancelled my India trip. Leaving for Italy on Monday. Can meet this weekend if you are around. Can I forward this to my benefactor in
Showing 10 of 19 emails. View all →
This dossier on Schulte was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.