Skip to content
Dossier
AssociateMentioned

Rioux

Court Filing

referenced in a previous court decision related to jury pool definition

Mentioned in 5 documents. Roles: referenced in a previous court decision related to jury pool definition, referenced in a previous case related to Equal Protection challenge, referenced in a relevant court case (United States v. Rioux), precedent case in the Second Circuit, case precedent

Nationality
Black Book
Not listed
Share
PostReddit

Rioux is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.

At a Glance

Click values for sources
0
Flight appearances
Document mentions
6 court
Known connections
2 weak
No
Black book entry
Evidence Types
Court Filing

Known Connections (4)

Document Mentions (6)

Court UnsealedUnknown

court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00365-DLC Document 1859 Filed 03/24/21 Page 20 of 20

The document discusses the court's decision on defining the relevant jury pool and community for Schulte's trial, agreeing with the Government that the northern counties from which White Plains draws jurors represent the relevant community.

1p
Court UnsealedUnknown

court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00383-PAC Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 18 of 20

The court rejects Schulte's Equal Protection claim and JSSA claims, finding no evidence of intentional discrimination and no substantial failure to comply with the JSSA. The court also dismisses Schulte's Sixth Amendment fair cross-section challenge.

1p
Court UnsealedUnknown

court filing: Case 1:20-cv-06539-JPC Document 185-1 Filed 03/22/21 Page 17 of 20

The document discusses Schulte's challenge to the jury selection process, arguing that it violates the Sixth Amendment and the Equal Protection clause due to underrepresentation of African Americans and Hispanic Americans. The court rejects these claims, citing the lack of proof of discriminatory intent and failure to establish a prima facie violation. The court relies on precedents such as Rioux and Castaneda in its decision.

1p
Court UnsealedUnknown

court filing: Case 2:17-cr-00383-JS Document 1859 Filed 03/22/21 Page 14 of 20

The court analyzes jury underrepresentation using the absolute disparity method and finds that the disparities in the representation of African Americans and Hispanic Americans in the White Plains master wheel are within the tolerated limits established by Second Circuit precedents.

1p
Court UnsealedUnknown

court filing: Case 4:20-cr-00354-PAE Document 1359 Filed 03/22/21 Page 16 of 20

The court rejects Schulte's claims that the Jury Plan violates the Sixth Amendment due to systematic exclusion, citing various reasons including the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the use of voter registration lists. The court relies on precedent, such as Rioux and Schanbarger, to support its conclusions. The defendant's allegations regarding the Jury Plan's replenishment period and exclusion of 'inactive voters' are also dismissed.

1p
Court UnsealedUnknown

court filing: Case:20-cj-017-00 Document#:1859 Filed:03/22/21

The court is analyzing the defendant's fair cross-section challenge and must determine the relevant jury venire. The defendant argues that the White Plains qualified wheel is the relevant jury venire, while the government contends that the White Plains master wheel is the correct jury venire. The court agrees with the government.

1p

This dossier on Rioux was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.