Dr. Rocchio
Prosecution expert witness whose opinions are being challenged
Mentioned in 2 documents. Roles: Prosecution expert witness whose opinions are being challenged, Expert Witness for the Government
Dr. Rocchio is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio, argui...
“Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio, argui”
The court rules on the defendant's motion to exclude the government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocch...
“The court rules on the defendant's motion to exclude the government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocch”
Court Filing - Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony: 386
“Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio, argui”
Court Filing - Expert Disclosure: 418-1
“This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, fe”
Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 435
“The court rules on the defendant's motion to exclude the government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocch”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 20 documents”
Known Connections (7)
Document Mentions (6)
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio, argui...
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio, arguing that her opinions on grooming and victim behavior are unreliable and prejudicial. The motion cites Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a Daubert hearing to assess the admissibility of Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
The court rules on the defendant's motion to exclude the government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocch...
The court rules on the defendant's motion to exclude the government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, and finds her testimony admissible with one exception. The court concludes that Dr. Rocchio is qualified as an expert and her methods are reliable and well-accepted in her profession. The court's decision is based on the Daubert standard and Federal Rule of Evidence 702.
Court Filing - Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony: 386
Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team moves to exclude the expert testimony of Dr. Lisa M. Rocchio, arguing that her opinions on grooming and victim behavior are unreliable and prejudicial. The motion cites Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, and requests a Daubert hearing to assess the admissibility of Dr. Rocchio's testimony.
Court Filing - Expert Disclosure: 418-1
This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, featuring testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on human memory and false memories, and Dr. Park Dietz on psychiatry and behavioral science. The experts are expected to challenge the prosecution's evidence and expert opinions.
Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 435
The court rules on the defendant's motion to exclude the government's expert witness, Dr. Lisa Rocchio, and finds her testimony admissible with one exception. The court concludes that Dr. Rocchio is qualified as an expert and her methods are reliable and well-accepted in her profession. The court's decision is based on the Daubert standard and Federal Rule of Evidence 702.
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 547
The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony on the science of memory and suggestive questioning. The letter cites examples from witness testimony and government interviews, asserting that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony and undermine the defendant's right to a defense.
This dossier on Dr. Rocchio was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.