Dr. Elizabeth F. Loftus
Defense expert witness
Mentioned in 9 documents. Roles: Defense expert witness, Defense expert witness on human memory and false memories, Defense expert witness on memory science, Expert Witness for the Defense, Expert witness for the defense on human memory
Dr. Elizabeth F. Loftus is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
Court Filing: 406
“The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where both parties pr”
Court Filing - Expert Disclosure: 418-1
“This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, fe”
Court Filing - Memorandum of Law: 424
“The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghisla”
Court Filing: 424-1
“The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, disclosing two expert witnesses:”
Court Filing: 482
“The court partially grants and denies the government's motion to preclude the testimony of two exper”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 36 documents”
Known Connections (9)
Document Mentions (9)
Court Filing: 406
The document is a court filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, where both parties present their positions on scheduling Daubert and Rule 412 hearings, and discuss issues related to expert testimony and disclosure.
Court Filing - Expert Disclosure: 418-1
This court filing is a summary of the defense's expert disclosures in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, featuring testimony from Dr. Elizabeth Loftus on human memory and false memories, and Dr. Park Dietz on psychiatry and behavioral science. The experts are expected to challenge the prosecution's evidence and expert opinions.
Court Filing - Memorandum of Law: 424
The document is a memorandum of law filed by the United States government in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell, arguing to preclude certain expert testimonies from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus based on the Daubert standard and other legal precedents. The government contests various aspects of the proposed testimonies, including opinions on hindsight bias, false memory formation, and witness credibility. The memorandum aims to exclude or limit the defense's expert witnesses' testimonies.
Court Filing: 424-1
The document is a court filing by Ghislaine Maxwell's defense team, disclosing two expert witnesses: Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who will testify on the science of memory, and Dr. Park Dietz, a forensic psychiatrist. Their testimonies may challenge the credibility of witnesses and the prosecution's case.
Court Filing: 482
The court partially grants and denies the government's motion to preclude the testimony of two expert witnesses, Dr. Dietz and Dr. Loftus, and orders the parties to propose redactions to certain documents and justify any requests for sealing by November 23, 2021.
Court Filing: 499
This court filing is Ghislaine Maxwell's response to the government's motion in limine to exclude expert testimony from Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus in her criminal case. The document argues for the admissibility of their testimony under Federal Rule of Evidence 702, citing relevant case law and the experts' qualifications. The defense contends that the experts' testimony is crucial for understanding issues like hindsight bias, the halo effect, and the psychology of false allegations.
Court Filing - Expert Disclosure: 499-1
The document is a court filing by the defense in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, disclosing two expert witnesses: Dr. Elizabeth Loftus, who will testify on human memory and false memories, and Dr. Park Dietz, who will testify on psychiatry and behavioral science. The experts' testimonies may challenge the prosecution's case and provide alternative explanations for the alleged crimes.
Court Filing - Opinion & Order: 516
The court rules on the government's motion to partially preclude the testimony of defense expert witnesses Dr. Park Dietz and Dr. Elizabeth Loftus. The court denies in part and grants in part the motion, allowing some of Dr. Dietz's opinions to be admitted while precluding others that may violate Federal Rule of Evidence 704(b).
Court Filing - Letter to Judge: 547
The defense attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, writes to Judge Alison J. Nathan arguing against the government's attempt to limit Dr. Loftus's expert testimony on the science of memory and suggestive questioning. The letter cites examples from witness testimony and government interviews, asserting that the government's actions are an effort to restrict relevant testimony and undermine the defendant's right to a defense.
This dossier on Dr. Elizabeth F. Loftus was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.