Dershowitz Testimony Suggests Hidden Agenda in Woody Allen Legal Proceedings
Summary
The passage provides vague hints of a ‘hidden agenda’ and scapegoating in the Woody Allen case, but offers no concrete names, dates, financial details, or actionable leads. It involves a well‑known at Dershowitz implies an undisclosed agenda influencing the court process. He references a ‘scapegoat’ narrative being constructed by lawyers. He expresses regret at not speaking directly with Woody All
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Witness Testimony Blocked Over Attorney-Client Privilege in Epstein-Related Trial
The passage suggests that key testimony about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and possibly former President Clinton is being suppressed by invoking attorney‑client privilege, indi Attorney‑client privilege is being used to block questions about Epstein and Maxwell. The court previously barred non‑Fifth Amendment questions about Dershowitz. Reference to “Clinton” and “other wor
Dershowitz Seeks to Seal Deposition of Virginia Giuffre While Alleging Prior Immunity Deal with Epstein and False Clinton Presence Claims
The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz is attempting to keep a deposition of Virginia Giuffre confidential, while simultaneously asserting that former President Clinton was not on Epstein’s island an Dershowitz requests the court modify a confidentiality order to use Giuffre’s deposition in his defe The motion cites a former FBI Director’s FOIA finding that President Clinton was not on Little St.
Judge Marra's Ruling on Victims' Rights Allegations and Potential Giuffre Testimony
The excerpt hints at a judicial decision that could affect the admissibility of allegations in a high‑profile case involving alleged victim testimony (Giuffre) and references to prominent legal figure Judge Marra allowed certain victim‑rights allegations to proceed, potentially shaping jury perceptio The court is scheduled to respond to a summary judgment motion on May 15, with a reply due July 15
Court filing discusses deposition tactics and alleged conspiracies in Giuffre case
The passage merely outlines procedural arguments about depositions and leading questions in a civil case involving Ms. Giuffre. It contains no specific names of powerful officials, financial transacti Mentions use of leading questions due to witness association with opposing party Claims the court approved alternative service and deposition schedule References a deadline dispute over deposition ti
Court hearing on limiting derogatory language in Giuffre defamation case
The passage merely records a procedural objection to calling a plaintiff a prostitute or slut in a defamation trial. It contains no concrete leads, transactions, or new allegations involving powerful Defense counsel objected to any derogatory language toward the plaintiff. The court is considering a motion to exclude terms like "prostitute" or "slut". The case involves defamation claims related t
Court denies amendment to add additional Jane Doe plaintiffs in CVRA case
The passage discusses procedural arguments about adding parties to a civil rights case and does not reveal any new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no Petitioners seek to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as parties but the court finds it unnecessary. Government argues Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was not known when a non‑prosecution agreeme T
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.