Skip to content
Case File
d-36468House OversightDeposition

Court filing discusses deposition tactics and alleged conspiracies in Giuffre case

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011446
Pages
1
Persons
2

Summary

The passage merely outlines procedural arguments about depositions and leading questions in a civil case involving Ms. Giuffre. It contains no specific names of powerful officials, financial transacti Mentions use of leading questions due to witness association with opposing party Claims the court approved alternative service and deposition schedule References a deadline dispute over deposition ti

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Tags

giuffre-casecivil-litigationdepositionlegal-exposurehouse-oversightcourt-procedureprocedural-misconduct
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Courtroom exchange over handling of deposition photos and exhibit labeling

The passage records a routine procedural dispute among lawyers and a court reporter about copying deposition photos and attaching exhibit stickers. It mentions no high‑profile individuals, agencies, f Lawyers discuss copying deposition photos for the court reporter. Concern expressed about proper exhibit labeling before documents leave the room. Minor tension between attorneys over courtroom decor

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Witness Testimony Blocked Over Attorney-Client Privilege in Epstein-Related Trial

The passage suggests that key testimony about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and possibly former President Clinton is being suppressed by invoking attorney‑client privilege, indi Attorney‑client privilege is being used to block questions about Epstein and Maxwell. The court previously barred non‑Fifth Amendment questions about Dershowitz. Reference to “Clinton” and “other wor

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition Copy Dispute Between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger

The excerpt details a procedural disagreement over copying documents for a deposition, with no mention of high‑profile individuals, financial transactions, or misconduct. It offers minimal investigati Mr. Leopold requests laser‑color copies of identified documents for the deposition. Mr. Goldberger proposes sending copies to the court reporter instead of handling them directly. Both parties discus

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Professor Alan Dershowitz seeks limited intervention in civil case, citing Fifth Amendment protections

The passage outlines a procedural filing by Dershowitz to intervene in a lawsuit and argues against adverse inferences from Fifth Amendment claims. It mentions no concrete financial flows, wrongdoing, Dershowitz files a motion for limited intervention to defend against alleged defamatory claims. The brief cites case law on adverse inference from Fifth Amendment assertions. If the court grants join

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Seeks to Seal Deposition of Virginia Giuffre While Alleging Prior Immunity Deal with Epstein and False Clinton Presence Claims

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz is attempting to keep a deposition of Virginia Giuffre confidential, while simultaneously asserting that former President Clinton was not on Epstein’s island an Dershowitz requests the court modify a confidentiality order to use Giuffre’s deposition in his defe The motion cites a former FBI Director’s FOIA finding that President Clinton was not on Little St.

39p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Judge Marra's Ruling on Victims' Rights Allegations and Potential Giuffre Testimony

The excerpt hints at a judicial decision that could affect the admissibility of allegations in a high‑profile case involving alleged victim testimony (Giuffre) and references to prominent legal figure Judge Marra allowed certain victim‑rights allegations to proceed, potentially shaping jury perceptio The court is scheduled to respond to a summary judgment motion on May 15, with a reply due July 15

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.