Skip to content
Case File
d-35869House OversightFinancial Record

Attorney‑Generated Oversight Memo Accuses DOJ Prosecutors of Misconduct, Conflict of Interest, and Political Motives in Jeffrey Epstein Federal Case

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #012135
Pages
85
Persons
3

Summary

The document provides a detailed, contemporaneous account of alleged DOJ misconduct—including unauthorized subpoenas, misrepresentations to the court, undisclosed financial incentives to witnesses, ex Alleged illegal re‑issuance of a grand‑jury subpoena after a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) was sig Claims that AUSA Villafana disclosed confidential case details to the New York Times and leaked in

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (3)

Tags

jeffrey-epsteindoj-misconductfinancial-flowconflict-of-interestforeign-influencenonprosecution-agreementfinancial-incentivesbill-clintonlegal-exposuremoderate-importancehouse-oversightprosecutorial-discretionmedia-leak
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Motion to Unseal Appellate Briefs in Jeffrey Epstein Appeal

The filing requests the unsealing of appellate briefs in the Jeffrey Epstein case, offering a concrete investigative step that could reveal new details about Epstein's network, financial arrangements, NYP Holdings, Inc. filed a motion on Jan 11 2019 to unseal appellate briefs in Epstein’s appeal (App The hearing was scheduled for Jan 21 2019, indicating the court’s willingness to consider disclosu

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court denies addition of new Jane Does in lawsuit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement

The passage reveals a procedural fight over standing to challenge Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, indicating ongoing litigation that could expose details of the deal. While it does not provide ne Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein’s non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejects their

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Epstein Loan Linked to Townhome Sale Proceeds in Court Testimony

The passage hints that proceeds from a townhome sale, allegedly financed by a loan from Jeffrey Epstein, are unaccounted for and may have been moved outside the court's jurisdiction. While lacking con Witness mentions a loan from Jeffrey Epstein used for a townhome purchase. Unclear disposition of the townhome sale proceeds. Court acknowledges no evidence on where the money went.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz Seeks to Seal Deposition of Virginia Giuffre While Alleging Prior Immunity Deal with Epstein and False Clinton Presence Claims

The filing reveals that Alan Dershowitz is attempting to keep a deposition of Virginia Giuffre confidential, while simultaneously asserting that former President Clinton was not on Epstein’s island an Dershowitz requests the court modify a confidentiality order to use Giuffre’s deposition in his defe The motion cites a former FBI Director’s FOIA finding that President Clinton was not on Little St.

39p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court denies addition of new Jane Doe plaintiffs in suit seeking to invalidate Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement

The passage reveals a pending civil action that challenges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement and mentions additional alleged victims (Jane Doe 3 and 4). While it does not provide new factual Petitioners are seeking to invalidate Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement. Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 request to join the suit, claiming similar CVRA rights violations. The court rejected adding these

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell

The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.