court filing: Case:de201c7-003130AsNnDRo6um#nt01002File#012318/28Page#31 of 36
Summary
The document analyzes various court cases to distinguish and support the detention or release of a defendant pending trial, focusing on factors such as risk of flight, extradition, and ties to foreign jurisdictions. It references several cases to illustrate the considerations taken into account in making such decisions. The analysis suggests that the decision to detain or release is heavily dependent on the specific circumstances of the defendant and the strength of the government's evidence.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Related Documents (6)
court filing: Case 1:17-cr-00330-AJN Document 101002 Filed 02/13/20 Page 28 of 36
The document argues that the defendant's proposed bail package is insufficient because the assets backing it originated primarily from the defendant, not her spouse, and therefore would not provide a sufficient deterrent against flight. The government maintains that the defendant's financial resources, foreign ties, and ability to live in hiding support detention. The court filing references a relevant Second Circuit case, United States v. Boustani, in discussing the limitations of private bail conditions.
Court Filing: 128
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Court Filing: 162
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting to file certain court documents under seal or with redactions to protect sensitive information. The government is submitting an unredacted version of their memorandum of law and exhibits in opposition to the defendant's pre-trial motions, while proposing redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy and the integrity of their investigation.
Court Filing: 241
The Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting redactions to certain documents related to the defense's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, citing the need to protect third-party privacy interests. The Court granted the request, ordering the Defendant and Boies Schiller to docket the documents with the proposed redactions.
Court Filing: 278
The government submits a letter to Judge Alison J. Nathan requesting limited redactions to the defendant's memorandum and seeking to file certain exhibits under seal to protect the privacy interests of victims and third parties. The proposed redactions are justified under the three-part test articulated in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga. The government is submitting proposed redactions to the Court by email.
Court Filing: 509-1
The government argues that Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony should be excluded as irrelevant, more prejudicial than probative, and consisting of inadmissible hearsay. The government disputes the defendant's claims that Dr. Hall's opinions are admissible under various rules of evidence, and argues that the testimony is an attempt to attack Minor Victim-4's credibility without a valid basis.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.