Court Filing: 509-1
Summary
The government argues that Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony should be excluded as irrelevant, more prejudicial than probative, and consisting of inadmissible hearsay. The government disputes the defendant's claims that Dr. Hall's opinions are admissible under various rules of evidence, and argues that the testimony is an attempt to attack Minor Victim-4's credibility without a valid basis.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (7)
Related Documents (6)
Court Filing: 397
The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions in limine, addressing the admissibility of expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that the evidence and testimony in question are relevant and admissible under various rules of evidence.
Court Filing: 452
The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions to exclude certain evidence and testimony, including expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that this evidence is admissible and relevant to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Court Filing: 509
The US Attorney's office requests permission to file a reply brief regarding the defendant's opposition to the government's motion to preclude Dr. Ryan Hall's testimony, addressing new arguments about hearsay exceptions and the report's relevance.
Court Filing: 128
The government responds to the court's order regarding the defendant's proposed redactions to pre-trial motions, agreeing with most redactions while suggesting additional ones to protect ongoing investigations and victim-witnesses' privacy. The letter is part of the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Court Filing: 162
The document is a letter from the US Attorney's Office to Judge Alison J. Nathan, requesting to file certain court documents under seal or with redactions to protect sensitive information. The government is submitting an unredacted version of their memorandum of law and exhibits in opposition to the defendant's pre-trial motions, while proposing redactions to certain documents to protect third-party privacy and the integrity of their investigation.
Court Filing: 241
The Government submitted a letter to the Court requesting redactions to certain documents related to the defense's proposed Rule 17(c) subpoena, citing the need to protect third-party privacy interests. The Court granted the request, ordering the Defendant and Boies Schiller to docket the documents with the proposed redactions.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.