Skip to content
Case File
d-7895Court UnsealedTestimony

Court Transcript: 6423-2

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 6423-2
Pages
2
Persons
2

Summary

The transcript captures the court's interaction with Juror No. 50 during voir dire, assessing their ability to remain impartial and unbiased. The court inquires about potential biases related to law enforcement, criminal defense lawyers, the criminal justice system, and socioeconomic factors. The juror affirms their ability to decide the case based on the evidence presented.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (2)

Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 2020-cr-00038

The transcript records the voir dire process for Juror No. 49 and Juror No. 50 in the case against Ms. Maxwell. The court and attorneys question the jurors to assess their ability to be fair and impartial, their background, and their understanding of the legal process.

3p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

Court Transcript: 645

The transcript is from a hearing in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, where Judge Alison J. Nathan presides over a hearing regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for a new trial. The court grants immunity to Juror 50, who had initially intended to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege, and proceeds to question him under oath.

50p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Appellate Brief: 20-00630

The document discusses Maxwell's appeal of the District Court's denial of her motion for a new trial, arguing that Juror 50's failure to accurately respond to questions about his history of sexual abuse during jury selection compromised her right to a fair and impartial jury. The appellate court reviews the District Court's decision for 'abuse of discretion' and defers to its judgment, citing the high standard for granting a new trial. The court ultimately upholds the District Court's denial of Maxwell's motion.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 20-2200330

Ghislaine Maxwell appealed her conviction for sex trafficking and related crimes, raising several issues including the validity of her prosecution and juror misconduct. The court affirmed the district court's judgment, finding no errors in the conduct of the case. Maxwell was sentenced to 240 months' imprisonment followed by supervised release.

3p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 2020-0088630

The document is a court filing arguing that a motion related to Juror 50 should remain sealed to protect Ms. Maxwell's right to a fair trial. The defense counsel asserts that unsealing the motion would give Juror 50 an improper preview of the defense's position and potentially allow him to tailor his answers or destroy evidence. The filing cites relevant case law to support the argument that the motion should be temporarily sealed until the court rules on it or completes any additional fact-finding process.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing - Appellate Decision: 22-14226

The document is an appellate court decision affirming Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence. The court held that the Non-Prosecution Agreement between Jeffrey Epstein and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida did not bar Maxwell's prosecution. The court also found that Maxwell's sentence was procedurally reasonable.

3p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.