Skip to content
Case File
d-673House OversightLegal Filing

The court filing discusses the necessity of a partial closure of court proceedings due to the COVID-...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-673
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The court filing discusses the necessity of a partial closure of court proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic and justifies allowing public access via telephone conference. The court finds that this measure is necessary to protect public health and safety and is narrowly tailored to achieve this interest. The order was issued by United States Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on July 2, 2020.

Tags

COVID-19 pandemic and court proceedingsPartial closure of court proceedingsPublic access to court hearings via telephone conference
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 1:20-mj-00132-AJ Document 2

The court filing discusses the necessity of a partial closure of court proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic and justifies allowing public access via telephone conference. The court finds that this measure is necessary to protect public health and safety and is narrowly tailored to achieve this interest. The order was issued by United States Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on July 2, 2020.

6p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a ...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal of a protective order for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the order was not a final decision and did not fall within the collateral order exception. The court also denied Maxwell's request for a writ of mandamus and her motion to consolidate the appeal with a related civil case.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction fo...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction for sex trafficking and related charges, rejecting her arguments that her prosecution was barred by Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement and that the statute of limitations had expired. The court also found that the District Court did not abuse its discretion in denying Maxwell's motion for a new trial and that her sentence was procedurally reasonable.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction an...

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed Ghislaine Maxwell's conviction and sentence, rejecting her claims that her prosecution was barred by Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement, that the indictment was untimely, and that the district court erred in handling her trial. The court held that Epstein's agreement did not bind the USAO-SDNY and that Maxwell's indictment was timely under 18 U.S.C. § 3283.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requests that the court dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the s...

The defendant, Ms. Maxwell, requests that the court dismiss either Count One or Count Three of the superseding indictment as they charge the same offense twice, violating the Double Jeopardy Clause. The counts charge conspiracy to commit a crime against the United States under 18 U.S.C. § 371 with different underlying crimes. The filing applies a multifactor test to determine whether the conspiracies are the same offense.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document is a Protective Order issued by the United States District Judge in a court case (1:19-...

The document is a Protective Order issued by the United States District Judge in a court case (1:19-cv-09233-AJN), outlining the rules for handling confidential information, including its disclosure, use, and challenging designations. The order also specifies procedures for filing documents under seal and the court's ability to modify the order.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.