Skip to content
Case File
d-6652Court UnsealedTestimony

court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616-20 Filed 02/24/22 Page 91 of 130

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 1:20-cr-00338-pae document 1616-20 filed 02/24/22 page 91 of 130
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumption that the government had also conducted a Google search on a juror. The court questions Brune about why they didn't disclose certain information earlier.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Browse epstein-docs ArchiveFile: 1:20-cr-00338-pae document 1616-20 filed 02/24/22 page 91 of 130
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightDepositionUnknown

The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumpt...

The witness, Brune, testifies about their understanding of disclosure requirements and their assumption that the government had also conducted a Google search on a juror. The court questions Brune about why they didn't disclose certain information earlier.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5742

The witness, Brune, testifies about working late and being present when the judge restarted jury deliberations due to a juror's illness. Brune states they did not believe there was an issue to raise with the court at the time.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5768

The document is a transcript of the cross-examination of a witness named Brune, discussing the investigation into Juror No. 1 and potential appellate issues. Brune testifies that his firm did not investigate Juror No. 1 further after the verdict. The witness denies attempting to 'sandbag' the court or plant error in the record regarding Juror No. 1.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22

The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.

1p
Court UnsealedTestimonyUnknown

court transcript: A-5635

The transcript records a court proceeding where the defendant's attorney explains that they are calling witness Catherine Conrad, for whom the government is seeking immunity. The court allows the witness to be examined, and the direct examination begins. The defendant's attorney clarifies that they would have called the witness regardless, to avoid any misimpression that the government selectively granted immunity.

1p
Court UnsealedDepositionUnknown

deposition transcript: A-5734

The witness, Brune, testifies that Juror No. 1 seemed normal during the trial and didn't raise any concerns. Brune was present when Juror No. 1 sent a note to the court, which was later read by Judge Pauley after summations. The note was marked as Court Exhibit 3.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.