Skip to content
Case File
d-645House OversightLegal Filing

The document discusses the defendant's request to stay civil proceedings due to a parallel criminal ...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-645
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The document discusses the defendant's request to stay civil proceedings due to a parallel criminal case, citing concerns about the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. The plaintiff argues that a stay would cause her harm due to ongoing effects of alleged abuse. The court weighs the interests of both parties in considering the request.

Tags

request to stay civil proceedings due to parallel criminal caseFifth Amendment privilege against self-incriminationpotential prejudice to plaintiff due to delay
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a c...

The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a civil case involving Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the additional depositions are unnecessary and duplicative. The defendant objects, citing the cumulative nature of the testimony and the burden on witnesses and counsel. The court filing provides insight into the case's procedural posture and the parties' litigation strategies.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

court filing: 1:20-cv-02484-DG

The document discusses the defendant's request to stay civil proceedings due to a parallel criminal case, citing concerns about the defendant's Fifth Amendment rights. The plaintiff argues that a stay would cause her harm due to ongoing effects of alleged abuse. The court weighs the interests of both parties in considering the request.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 23509

The document discusses the plaintiff's request to exceed the presumptive ten deposition limit in a civil case involving Jeffrey Epstein, arguing that the additional depositions are unnecessary and duplicative. The defendant objects, citing the cumulative nature of the testimony and the burden on witnesses and counsel. The court filing provides insight into the case's procedural posture and the parties' litigation strategies.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: Case 1:20-cv-00803-RP Document 122-20 Filed 06/04/21 Page 63 of 8

Ms. Maxwell requests the court to order the Plaintiff to disclose information about alleged ongoing criminal investigations or stay the proceedings. The Plaintiff has represented that she is part of an ongoing investigation involving Ms. Maxwell, but Ms. Maxwell is unaware of any such investigation. The Defendant's counsel has attempted to verify the existence of the investigation with the Assistant United States Attorney.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alte...

The court ordered the defendant detained pending trial, citing the risk of flight and rejecting alternative measures such as electronic monitoring. The decision was based on factors including the nature of the crimes charged and the defendant's characteristics. The court's ruling was made in accordance with the Bail Reform Act.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package a...

The document discusses the defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million bail package and other conditions to address concerns regarding risk of flight. The court has inherent authority to reconsider its previous bail decision, and the defendant's new proposal aims to address the court's original concerns. The proposed conditions include a personal recognizance bond, home confinement with GPS monitoring, and restricted travel.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.