Skip to content
Case File
d-31266House OversightDeposition

Court filing argues against labeling Virginia Giuffre as a prostitute and discusses PTSD expert testimony

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #011355
Pages
1
Persons
4

Summary

The passage provides routine litigation arguments about reputational language and expert testimony in a civil case involving Virginia Giuffre and a Maxwell associate. It mentions no new financial flow Defense objects to using derogatory terms for plaintiff Virginia Giuffre. Claims plaintiff’s PTSD is unrelated to the defendant’s actions. Cites an exhibit showing internet descriptions of Giuffre as

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

litigationdefamationcivil-procedurelegal-exposurehouse-oversightreputational-riskexpert-testimony
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Court transcript snippet discussing defamation claims involving alleged sexual abuse and references to Epstein and Maxwell

The passage provides a vague reference to alleged sexual abuse and a possible connection to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, but offers no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable lead The case involves defamation claims centered on alleged sexual abuse. Plaintiff alleges the defendant was a 'madam' and co-conspirator with Jeffrey Epstein. The court is focusing on the truth or fals

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Plaintiff seeks damages and defamation relief against Tyler McDonald and Yi.Org for alleged loss of business revenue

The filing outlines a civil claim for monetary damages and defamation against a private individual and his website. It provides no names of high‑profile officials, no financial flow details, and no no Plaintiff alleges loss of business revenue exceeding $15,000 due to actions of Tyler McDonald/Yi.Org Claims defamation: false statements published via the defendant’s domain hosting service. Plaintif

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Dershowitz motion to seal records in Edwards & Cassell case mentions alleged ties to former world leaders and Ms. Giuffre

The passage references a high‑profile attorney (Alan Dershowitz) and a controversial accuser (Virginia Giuffre) and alleges that the defendants have lied about former prime ministers and presidents. H Dershowitz seeks to place evidence under seal, potentially shielding information. The filing accuses Edwards and Cassell of unethical conduct and of profiting from Giuffre’s story. Allegations that G

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Alan Dershowitz seeks aggressive subpoenas of Virginia Giuffre in Florida civil case

The passage reveals that high‑profile attorney Alan Dershowitz is using civil litigation to obtain a large, potentially harassing subpoena of Virginia Giuffre, a known accuser in the Jeffrey Epstein m Alan Dershowitz is the defendant serving the subpoena. The subpoena targets Virginia Roberts Giuffre (Jane Doe No. 3). Dershowitz allegedly stated his goal is to put Giuffre in jail.

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Requests for flight records and documents linking Epstein’s legal team and relatives to his private plane

The passage reveals that plaintiffs are seeking concrete evidence—flight manifests and "absolute proof"—that could tie high‑profile individuals (a defendant’s nephew, members of Epstein’s legal team) Plaintiffs request documents proving the defendant's nephew was on Epstein's private plane. Requests also target members of Epstein's legal team for flight evidence. Defendant objects on relevance an

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Defendant Alan Dershowitz seeks subpoena of Jane Doe #3 in Florida defamation case, allegedly to target a sexual‑trafficking victim

The filing hints at possible intimidation of a trafficking victim by a high‑profile attorney, suggesting a misuse of legal process. While it names a well‑known figure (Alan Dershowitz) and raises conc Alan Dershowitz is the defendant seeking a subpoena of a non‑party identified only as Jane Doe #3. The motion claims the subpoena is unrelated to the underlying defamation suit and is intended to int

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.