Court strikes numerous paragraphs in filings involving Jane Doe aliases and denies Alan Dershowitz's intervention motion
Summary
The passage details routine procedural rulings—striking impertinent paragraphs and denying a motion to intervene—without revealing new facts, financial flows, or connections to high‑profile actors bey The court struck multiple paragraphs from declarations citing non‑party details. Jane Doe #3 and #4 are pseudonyms; no substantive allegations disclosed. Alan Dershowitz's motion to intervene was den
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Professor Alan Dershowitz seeks limited intervention in civil case, citing Fifth Amendment protections
The passage outlines a procedural filing by Dershowitz to intervene in a lawsuit and argues against adverse inferences from Fifth Amendment claims. It mentions no concrete financial flows, wrongdoing, Dershowitz files a motion for limited intervention to defend against alleged defamatory claims. The brief cites case law on adverse inference from Fifth Amendment assertions. If the court grants join
Dershowitz seeks to seal Giuffre affidavit in Edwards‑Cassell defamation case, claims media attacks are fabricated
The passage hints at a possible concealment of evidence in a high‑profile defamation dispute involving Alan Dershowitz, a prominent attorney, and references the infamous Giuffre allegations. While it Dershowitz requests the court to declare portions of Ms. Giuffre’s affidavit confidential. He publicly denies the allegations on BBC Radio 4, framing them as a coordinated false‑story campaig Dershow
Court transcript excerpt referencing alleged defamation claim involving Ms. Giuffre/Maxwell and mention of Alan Dershowitz
The passage provides a vague procedural discussion about a joinder motion and a brief, unsubstantiated reference to Alan Dershowitz. It lacks concrete details such as dates, transactions, or specific The court is addressing a joinder issue related to a defamation claim by Ms. Giuffre/Maxwell. Counsel mentions Alan Dershowitz in passing, suggesting possible involvement or relevance. No specific fa
Court hearing references alleged accusations involving world leaders and Alan Dershowitz in a sexual‑abuse case
The passage hints at a claim that a plaintiff’s statement links high‑profile figures (unspecified world leaders and Alan Dershowitz) to alleged wrongdoing, suggesting a possible foreign‑influence or e Plaintiff’s statement reportedly mentions "world leaders" and Alan Dershowitz as part of alleged lie Defense counsel argues the plaintiff would lose if she cannot prove Maxwell’s role. The court appe
Court denies amendment to add additional Jane Doe plaintiffs in CVRA case
The passage discusses procedural arguments about adding parties to a civil rights case and does not reveal any new allegations, financial flows, or involvement of high‑profile officials. It offers no Petitioners seek to add Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 as parties but the court finds it unnecessary. Government argues Jane Doe 4 lacks standing because she was not known when a non‑prosecution agreeme T
Witness Testimony Blocked Over Attorney-Client Privilege in Epstein-Related Trial
The passage suggests that key testimony about Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell, Alan Dershowitz, and possibly former President Clinton is being suppressed by invoking attorney‑client privilege, indi Attorney‑client privilege is being used to block questions about Epstein and Maxwell. The court previously barred non‑Fifth Amendment questions about Dershowitz. Reference to “Clinton” and “other wor
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.