House Oversight hearing cancellation discussion between Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger
Summary
The passage records a brief exchange about a cancelled hearing with no concrete details, names, dates, or financial transactions. It mentions only two individuals whose identities and relevance are un Mr. Leopold claims ignorance of why the hearing was cancelled. Mr. Goldberger expresses personal inconvenience over the cancellation. Leopold offers to obtain an affidavit from a Mr. Pincus.
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Fragmented House Oversight Transcript with No Substantive Claims
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue from a hearing with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers no actionable leads or novel information about influential actors Contains brief mentions of Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger. References attorney-client privilege objections. No specific misconduct, transactions, or policy issues identified.
Transcript excerpt showing heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage contains only a brief, uncited dialogue with no names of high‑profile officials, no financial or misconduct details, and no actionable leads. It offers no novel or controversial informatio Shows a tense interaction between two participants in a House Oversight hearing No substantive allegations, dates, transactions, or policy issues are mentioned
Heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage records a confrontational dialogue with no concrete allegations, dates, financial details, or links to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond noting a possible Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of lying in a letter to co‑counsel. Both parties exchange threats of sanctions and accusations of obstruction. The exchange occurs during a House Oversight session (docum
Transcript excerpt from House Oversight hearing questioning Mr. Leopold about alleged drug habit of his twin sister
The passage provides a vague, fragmented exchange with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations linking any high‑ranking official or powerful entity to misconduct. It lacks a Witness is questioned about a twin sister's alleged drug habit. Accusations of lying about a visit to a crack house in Georgia are raised. Multiple objections are raised by Mr. Leopold, indicating co
Fragmentary House Oversight Transcript with Unclear References
The excerpt consists of disjointed dialogue fragments lacking clear names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations. It provides no actionable leads, novel information, or connections to high‑r The text appears to be a partial transcript from a House oversight hearing. Mentions a person named 'Mr. Leopold' and a question about 'Wellington' college. No concrete details about financial flows,
Fragmented transcript from House Oversight hearing with unclear references to a person named Jeff and a massage
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue fragments lacking clear names, dates, transactions, or substantive allegations. It provides no actionable leads, novel information, or connections to high‑r Mentions a person named Jeff and a massage context References a Mr. Leopold and a Mr. Tein Appears to be from a House Oversight hearing transcript dated 01/24/23
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.