Heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
Summary
The passage records a confrontational dialogue with no concrete allegations, dates, financial details, or links to high‑level officials. It offers minimal investigative value beyond noting a possible Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of lying in a letter to co‑counsel. Both parties exchange threats of sanctions and accusations of obstruction. The exchange occurs during a House Oversight session (docum
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Transcript excerpt showing a contentious deposition exchange with no clear high‑profile actors
The passage records a heated deposition dialogue but lacks any identifiable influential individuals, concrete transactions, dates, or substantive allegations. It offers minimal investigative value bey A deposition was cancelled and later reinstated without clear reason. Mr. Tein expresses frustration over the cancellation and mentions a personal impact on 'Jack'. Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger are
Transcript excerpt shows obscure witness questioning about reporters and alleged drug arrest
The passage provides vague, fragmented testimony with no concrete names, dates, financial amounts, or clear links to high‑level officials. It mentions a witness, their mother and her husband Paul, but Witness repeatedly denied any contact with reporters or receipt of money. Reference to an alleged drug arrest and cooperation, but no details. Names mentioned: Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, Paul (husband of
House Oversight hearing transcript shows heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold over witness questioning
The passage records a procedural dispute in a congressional hearing with no specific names of high‑ranking officials, no financial or foreign influence details, and no actionable leads. It offers mini Mr. Leopold objects to a line of questioning as improper. Mr. Tein challenges Leopold's demeanor and asks him to stop. The exchange highlights tension but provides no concrete allegations or evidence
Fragmented House Oversight Transcript with No Substantive Claims
The passage consists of disjointed dialogue from a hearing with no concrete allegations, names, dates, or financial details. It offers no actionable leads or novel information about influential actors Contains brief mentions of Mr. Tein, Mr. Leopold, and Mr. Goldberger. References attorney-client privilege objections. No specific misconduct, transactions, or policy issues identified.
Transcript excerpt showing heated exchange between Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold during House Oversight hearing
The passage contains only a brief, uncited dialogue with no names of high‑profile officials, no financial or misconduct details, and no actionable leads. It offers no novel or controversial informatio Shows a tense interaction between two participants in a House Oversight hearing No substantive allegations, dates, transactions, or policy issues are mentioned
Deposition Dispute Over Exhibit Marking in House Oversight Hearing
The passage records a procedural disagreement about marking exhibits during a deposition. It mentions no high‑ranking officials, financial transactions, or substantive allegations of misconduct, offer Mr. Leopold threatens court sanctions if exhibits are removed unmarked. Mr. Tein disputes the claim that exhibits are unmarked. Mr. Goldberger references long‑standing practice without prior disputes
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.