Skip to content
Case File
d-1427House OversightLegal Filing

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions in limine, addressing the admissi...

Date
Unknown
Source
House Oversight
Reference
d-1427
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions in limine, addressing the admissibility of expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that the evidence and testimony in question are relevant and admissible under various rules of evidence.

Tags

Admissibility of expert testimony by Dr. Lisa RocchioAdmissibility of evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4Co-conspirator statements and their admissibility under Fed. R. Evid. 801(d)(2)(E)
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions to exclude certain evidence and t...

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions to exclude certain evidence and testimony, including expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that this evidence is admissible and relevant to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 397

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions in limine, addressing the admissibility of expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that the evidence and testimony in question are relevant and admissible under various rules of evidence.

84p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 452

The government's memorandum argues against the defendant's motions to exclude certain evidence and testimony, including expert testimony by Dr. Lisa Rocchio, evidence related to Minor Victim-3 and Minor Victim-4, and co-conspirator statements. The government asserts that this evidence is admissible and relevant to the case against Ghislaine Maxwell.

84p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The government opposes the defendant's bail request, arguing that she has not provided sufficient fi...

The government opposes the defendant's bail request, arguing that she has not provided sufficient financial information and that her proposed bail package, secured by a foreign property, offers little to no security. The defendant is charged with serious crimes involving the sexual exploitation of minors and has extensive foreign ties, increasing her risk of flight.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell requests a two-week extension to file pretrial motions and mo...

The defense team for Ghislaine Maxwell requests a two-week extension to file pretrial motions and modify the briefing schedule due to COVID-19 restrictions and the large volume of discovery. The government consents to the requested extension. The proposed new deadlines are January 25, 2021, for the defendant's motions, February 26, 2021, for the government's response, and March 5, 2021, for the defendant's reply.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Paul M. Daugerdas, who was in...

The document appears to be a court filing related to the sentencing of Paul M. Daugerdas, who was involved in a tax shelter scheme. The government, led by Preet Bharara, is seeking restitution and has submitted evidence to support their claims. The defendant's counsel, Dennis J. Lerner, has also submitted filings in response.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.