The government opposes the defendant's bail request, arguing that she has not provided sufficient fi...
Summary
The government opposes the defendant's bail request, arguing that she has not provided sufficient financial information and that her proposed bail package, secured by a foreign property, offers little to no security. The defendant is charged with serious crimes involving the sexual exploitation of minors and has extensive foreign ties, increasing her risk of flight.
Persons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document argues that the defendant should be denied bail due to her access to significant financ...
The document argues that the defendant should be denied bail due to her access to significant financial resources and lack of ties to the United States, making her a flight risk. It also disputes the effectiveness of proposed bail conditions such as ankle-bracelet monitoring. The government cites previous cases to support its argument that electronic monitoring is not foolproof.
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant...
The document is a court filing opposing the defendant's request for bail, arguing that the defendant poses a significant flight risk and that the government's case remains strong despite the defendant's pretrial motions. The court should deny the defendant's motion for bail due to the risk of flight and lack of new information.
The Government has identified numerous bank accounts associated with the defendant, with total balan...
The Government has identified numerous bank accounts associated with the defendant, with total balances ranging from hundreds of thousands to over $20 million between 2016 and the present. The defendant has engaged in significant financial transactions, including transfers of hundreds of thousands of dollars, and has reported holding foreign bank accounts containing over a million dollars. The Government notes a significant property sale in 2016 and past financial transactions with Jeffrey Epstein.
The government argues that the defendant's offer to renounce her French and British citizenship is a...
The government argues that the defendant's offer to renounce her French and British citizenship is a strategic move that does not guarantee extradition, as France's extradition laws are based on nationality at the time of the alleged crime, and the UK's extradition process is complex and uncertain.
The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and A...
The document is a court filing submitted by the Acting United States Attorney, Audrey Strauss, and Assistant United States Attorneys, arguing that the defendant's renewed bail motion should be denied due to the risk of flight. The court had previously found that the defendant poses a substantial actual risk of flight, and the government asserts that no conditions of bail can mitigate this risk. The motion is dated December 16, 2020.
The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, a...
The United States Attorney's office submits a response opposing the defendant's third bail motion, arguing that the proposed bail conditions are insufficient to mitigate the risk of flight. The government contends that the court should deny the motion due to the defendant's continued risk of flight. The document is signed by Audrey Strauss, United States Attorney, and several Assistant United States Attorneys.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.