parties involved in the case
recipients of protected material
Mentioned in 2 documents. Roles: recipients of protected material, subject to the protective order
parties involved in the case is mentioned in documents or reporting related to the Epstein case. Being mentioned does not imply any wrongdoing, criminal conduct, or inappropriate behavior.
At a Glance
Click values for sourcesSources
5 sources for document mentions
The proposed protective order governs the disclosure and use of confidential information in the case...
“The proposed protective order governs the disclosure and use of confidential information in the case”
This Certificate of Service confirms that on June 6, 2016, the Defendant's Response was electronical...
“This Certificate of Service confirms that on June 6, 2016, the Defendant's Response was electronical”
The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, that they...
“The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, that they”
Court Filing - Protective Order: 124-6
“This is a Protective Order issued in a court case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), defining who can access confi”
Court Filing - Proposed Protective Order: 126-3
“The proposed protective order governs the disclosure and use of confidential information in the case”
Sources
1 source for known connections
Co-Document Mentions
“Named alongside other network members in 18 documents”
Known Connections (8)
Document Mentions (10)
The proposed protective order governs the disclosure and use of confidential information in the case...
The proposed protective order governs the disclosure and use of confidential information in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, including documents, deposition testimony, and other materials. It establishes procedures for designating and handling confidential information, and outlines the persons to whom such information may be disclosed. The order aims to protect sensitive information related to the parties and non-parties involved in the case.
This Certificate of Service confirms that on June 6, 2016, the Defendant's Response was electronical...
This Certificate of Service confirms that on June 6, 2016, the Defendant's Response was electronically served via ECF on several attorneys and parties involved in the case. The document lists the recipients and their email addresses. Nicole Simmons certified the service.
The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, that they...
The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, that they be allowed to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming sentencing hearing, citing their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The letter is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan and copied to various parties involved in the case.
Court Filing - Protective Order: 124-6
This is a Protective Order issued in a court case (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), defining who can access confidential information and under what conditions. It lists categories of individuals who can be privy to protected material and requires them to acknowledge the order before disclosure. The order aims to safeguard sensitive information throughout the legal proceedings.
Court Filing - Proposed Protective Order: 126-3
The proposed protective order governs the disclosure and use of confidential information in the case of Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell, including documents, deposition testimony, and other materials. It establishes procedures for designating and handling confidential information, and outlines the persons to whom such information may be disclosed. The order aims to protect sensitive information related to the parties and non-parties involved in the case.
Court Filing: 144-3
This court filing details a protective order governing the disclosure of confidential information in a specific case, listing the individuals and groups authorized to access such information and the procedures for doing so.
Certificate of Service: 2016-00890
This Certificate of Service confirms that on June 6, 2016, the Defendant's Response was electronically served via ECF on several attorneys and parties involved in the case. The document lists the recipients and their email addresses. Nicole Simmons certified the service.
Court Filing: 666
The MARSH law firm requests on behalf of their clients, Sarah Ransome and Elizabeth Stein, that they be allowed to speak at Ghislaine Maxwell's upcoming sentencing hearing, citing their rights under the Crime Victims' Rights Act. The letter is addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan and copied to various parties involved in the case.
Table of Authorities: Case:de201e7-00330-ADN Document#:01002 Filed:03/18/20 Page:3 of 36
The document lists numerous court cases and their corresponding citations, which are used to support legal arguments in a court filing. The cases cited involve a range of legal issues and are drawn from various jurisdictions. The table is likely used to provide a quick reference for the court and other parties involved in the case.
email: DOJ-OGR-00024220
An email exchange regarding an order in the USA v. Jeffrey Epstein case (19 cr 490), sent between two individuals with redacted names, likely court staff or parties involved in the case.
This dossier on parties involved in the case was compiled from court records, flight logs, and public documents. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.