transcript: A-5906
Summary
The transcript discusses a case where an attorney, Theresa, had second thoughts about a juror and investigated further, ultimately deciding to keep the juror. The discussion highlights the government's view that the decision was strategic and aimed at securing an acquittal.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 16166320 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The document appears to be a transcript of a court hearing or argument where an attorney is discussing the strategic decisions made during juror selection, specifically regarding a juror with a 'checkered history'. The attorney argues that their decision was not a 'sandbagging' tactic, but rather a genuine change of heart after re-evaluating the juror's note.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616620 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 117
The document appears to be a transcript of a legal discussion or argument, focusing on whether the actions of the Brune law firm on May 12, 2011, constituted a 'strategic judgment'. The speaker analyzes the concept of strategic judgment, referencing the Second Circuit and Justice Stevens' dissent, to determine if the firm's actions were a deliberate choice or oversight.
Court Transcript: 1:20-cv-13003
This document is a transcript of a court proceeding on February 15, 2012, featuring testimonies from Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, with various attorneys conducting direct and cross-examinations, and a list of government and defense exhibits received into evidence.
Court Transcript Index: A-5670
This is an index to a court transcript from the trial of Paul M. Daugerdas, detailing the examination of witnesses Theresa Marie Trzaskoma and Catherine M. Conrad, as well as the receipt of various government and defense exhibits.
court transcript: 11220ecr0033389PAIN
The court transcript shows the judge giving instructions to the parties on protecting alleged victims' privacy, handling sensitive information, and making objections during the trial. The Government and defense attorney discuss and agree on certain procedures, with the defense attorney noting an objection. The court then takes a five-minute break.
court transcript: 1:20-cr-00303-PAE Document 611 Filed 02/24/22
The transcript shows the redirect examination of witness Ms. Edelstein, with the court asking questions about the disclosure of information regarding Juror No. 1 and whether the law firm would have disclosed it without the court's inquiry or the government's action. The witness responds that they thought it would come out at some point during the proceedings.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.