deposition transcript: A-5786
Summary
The witness is being questioned about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1 and a suspended lawyer with a similar name. Ms. Trzaskoma had considered the possibility that they were the same person but after reviewing voir dire responses, found inconsistencies. The witness ultimately concluded that they were not the same person.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Related Documents (6)
Deposition transcript: A-5737
The witness recounts a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein about Juror No. 1, speculating that she might be a suspended lawyer due to similarities between her voir dire responses and the juror note. They discussed the juror's background, including a personal injury suit, and initially downplayed the significance of the juror note.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cr-00338-PAE Document 1616220 Filed 02/24/22 Page 58 of 130
The witness clarifies the timeline of events related to a court case, initially making an error but later correcting it to July 18th. The discussion involves the witness's knowledge of a Westlaw report and the characteristics of Ms. Edelstein. The transcript appears to be part of a larger legal proceeding.
deposition transcript: 1:20-cv-13038
The witness, Schoeman, testifies about a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma regarding Juror No. 1, discussing a person with the same name who was a disbarred lawyer. Trzaskoma assured Schoeman it was not the same person based on the voir dire process. No further discussion about Juror No. 1 occurred with Trzaskoma or anyone at the Brune firm during that time.
deposition transcript: A-5710
The witness, Brune, testifies about their firm's handling of jury selection in a case, confirming that partner Trzaskoma was involved in gathering information about potential jurors and was supervised by Brune.
deposition transcript: A-5724
The witness, Brune, testifies about the methods used to investigate potential jurors, stating that they relied on sworn testimony during voir dire and did not conduct a full-scale private investigation. Brune also discusses the handling of juror information, including the use of middle initials to identify jurors.
deposition transcript: A-5727
The witness, Brune, is being questioned about the voir dire process in Judge Pauley's courtroom, specifically about the role of counsel in raising concerns and questions about potential jurors. The questioning highlights Ms. Trzaskoma's involvement in raising issues with potential jurors, including one who worked at Goldman Sachs. The document reveals the collaborative and transparent nature of the voir dire process in this case.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.