The document argues that the Ministry's interpretation of extradition law is incorrect, citing the E...
Summary
The document argues that the Ministry's interpretation of extradition law is incorrect, citing the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France and the French Code of Criminal Procedure. It asserts that nationality protection only applies to individuals who were French nationals at the time of the offense, not at the time of the extradition request. The document is a legal argument presented by attorney William Julié.
Persons Referenced (1)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
The document is an expert opinion by French lawyer William Julié on the extradition laws between the...
The document is an expert opinion by French lawyer William Julié on the extradition laws between the US and France. Julié argues that the French Minister of Justice's letter, which stated that France does not extradite its citizens outside the EU, is misleading and that the Extradition Treaty between the US and France gives France discretion to extradite its nationals. Julié also critiques the government's reliance on the Peterson case as a precedent.
The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French nationa...
The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French national to the US, analyzing the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, and relevant agreements. Julié concludes that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals and that the French government is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met. The document highlights the importance of considering the discretionary power in extradition decisions and the impact of subsequent agreements on the Extradition Treaty.
The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individ...
The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters.
The document, authored by William Julié, an attorney at law, provides a legal analysis arguing that ...
The document, authored by William Julié, an attorney at law, provides a legal analysis arguing that certain provisions regarding extradition should not apply to individuals who have lost French nationality at the time of the extradition request. It interprets the relevant treaty and French law, concluding that the nationality status at the time of the request is what matters for extradition purposes.
The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion...
The document is a response to the US government's memorandum opposing the defendant's renewed motion for release, written by William Julié, a French lawyer. It analyzes the French Minister of Justice's letter and argues that the key question is whether France can extradite a French national under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, not under French legislation. The document highlights the precedence of international agreements over national legislation according to the French Constitution.
court filing: 20-0330
The document argues that the court has jurisdiction to decide on bail conditions despite a pending appeal and that Ms. Maxwell's renunciation of her foreign citizenship is a valid condition of release, contrary to the government's assertion based on a letter from the French Ministry of Justice.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.