Skip to content
Case File
d-7162Court UnsealedLegal Filing

Court Filing: 2333

Date
Unknown
Source
Court Unsealed
Reference
File: 2333
Pages
1
Persons
6

Summary

Attorneys for Minor Victim-2 requested permission to bring electronic devices to court hearings and trial in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. The judge partially denied the request for the arraignment but allowed for renewal before future proceedings.

This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.

View Source Collection
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 233

Sigrid McCawley, attorney for Minor Victim-2, requests permission from Judge Alison J. Nathan to bring electronic devices to the courthouse for scheduled hearings and trial in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. The request is made in accordance with Standing Order M10-468. The letter is filed via ECF on April 22, 2021.

1p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Order: 182-4

The document is a court order granting Sigrid S. McCawley's motion for Pro Hac Vice admission to represent victims in the case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The order confirms McCawley's good standing in Florida and Washington, D.C. bars and subjects her to the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Order: 233-1

This court order authorizes attorneys Sigrid McCawley and David Boies to bring personal electronic devices and general purpose computing devices into the courthouse for use in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell trial. The order specifies the devices allowed and courtrooms where they can be used. The attorneys are required to comply with the restrictions and obligations set forth in Standing Order M10-468, as Revised.

2p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court Filing: 247

Boies Schiller Flexner LLP objects to Ghislaine Maxwell's motion for an order authorizing a subpoena, arguing that it is an improper attempt to obtain discovery beyond what is required under Rule 16 and Brady. The law firm contends that Maxwell's requests lack specificity as required by United States v. Nixon.

17p
Court UnsealedLegal FilingUnknown

Court filing: Case1:20-cr-00320-AJN Document 272 Filed 07/02/20 Page 4 of 457

The document discusses public statements made by lawyers and government officials in the Ghislaine Maxwell case, arguing that they violate Local Rule 23.1 by making presumptively prejudicial comments. It cites specific statements by FBI Special Agent William Sweeney and attorneys David Boies, Sigrid McCawley, and Bradley Edwards. The document suggests that these statements could prejudice the case and potentially violate the rules governing pretrial publicity.

1p
House OversightLegal FilingUnknown

Sigrid McCawley, attorney for Minor Victim-2, requests permission from Judge Alison J. Nathan to bri...

Sigrid McCawley, attorney for Minor Victim-2, requests permission from Judge Alison J. Nathan to bring electronic devices to the courthouse for scheduled hearings and trial in the United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. The request is made in accordance with Standing Order M10-468. The letter is filed via ECF on April 22, 2021.

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.