Court Filing: 20cr833 (D.N.J. filed 11/18/20)
Summary
This court filing outlines the procedures for the defendant and defense counsel to access and handle discovery materials marked as 'highly confidential' by the government. It restricts the dissemination and copying of such materials and requires designated persons and potential defense witnesses to sign an order acknowledging the confidentiality obligations. The order aims to balance the defendant's right to prepare for trial with the need to protect sensitive information.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (7)
Related Documents (6)
Court Order or Protective Order related to Discovery: Case: 20-60033 Document: 00610033026 Page: 11 Filed: 11/06/12
This document is a court order governing the handling of Discovery materials in a case, including the protection of Confidential Information and the procedures for returning or destroying such materials after the case concludes. It outlines the responsibilities of Defense Counsel and the Government regarding these materials. The order remains in effect until modified or until certain conditions are met.
Court Filing: 20-80033-CR-AUNEN-Document#136-2
This court filing outlines the procedures for handling Confidential Information in a criminal case, including restrictions on use, storage, and access. The defendant is allowed limited access to sensitive documents under the supervision of Defense Counsel. The Government's designation of documents as Confidential Information is controlling unless overridden by a court order.
Court Order: 20-80003-CR-AUNEN-DOCUMENT#1362
This court order governs the disclosure of discovery materials to various individuals, including defense staff, experts, and potential witnesses. It requires designated persons to agree to be bound by the order's terms before receiving discovery materials. The order aims to protect sensitive information while allowing the defendant to prepare for trial.
court filing: 20-CR-033 (LJL)
The court denied the defendant's request to modify a protective order that governed the use of discovery materials produced by the government in a criminal case. The court found that the defendant had not sufficiently substantiated a request to deviate from the status quo. The protective order was originally entered on July 30, 2020.
court filing: 21-00338
The document discusses the defendant's third motion for release on bail, the government's opposition, and the legal standards governing bail under the Eighth Amendment and the Bail Reform Act. The court considers its jurisdiction to grant the motion while the defendant's bail appeal is pending. The court ultimately denies the defendant's motion without resolving the jurisdictional question.
court filing: 3550
The Government responds to the Court's Order regarding the delivery of legal mail to the defendant, explaining that expedited delivery is not practicable and that the MDC's legal department has various responsibilities for 1,700 inmates. The Government details the delivery of a hard drive containing Court-ordered disclosures and explains that an institutional emergency impacted delivery on one day.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.