Memorandum/Opinion: 20-cr-00880-AJN Document 11-02 Filed 03/23/21 Page d31of518
Summary
The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters.
This document is from the epstein-docs Archive.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (5)
Related Documents (6)
Memorandum/Opinion Letter: doj-ogr-00020185
The memorandum, written by William Julié, argues that the French government can extradite an individual who renounces their French nationality, countering the Ministry of Justice's claim that nationality at the time of the alleged offense is what matters. It was written in support of Ghislaine Maxwell's bail proceedings in the US. The author asserts that the Ministry's position is not supported by law.
Legal Memorandum/Expert Opinion: Case 1:04-cr-00320-AJT Document 1033-1 Filed 12/27/20 Page 366 of 4
The document is a legal analysis by William Julié, a French lawyer, discussing the extradition laws between France and the USA. It argues that the French government has discretion to extradite its nationals under the Extradition Treaty between the USA and France, and questions the relevance of the Peterson case as a precedent. The analysis highlights the difference between a judicial decision and a discretionary decision by the French Ministry of Justice in extradition matters.
Expert Opinion or Affidavit: 201-700320
The document, authored by French lawyer William Julié, discusses the extradition of a French national to the US, analyzing the Extradition Treaty between the US and France, and relevant agreements. Julié concludes that there is no absolute rule against extraditing French nationals and that the French government is likely to extradite Ms. Maxwell if certain conditions are met. The document highlights the importance of considering the discretionary power in extradition decisions and the impact of subsequent agreements on the Extradition Treaty.
court filing: 2017-00330-AUM-Document 010302 Filed 03/28/20 Page 8 of 15
The document is a court filing by the defense, responding to government allegations that Ms. Maxwell is a flight risk. It argues that the government's interpretations are unfounded and that Ms. Maxwell's actions were taken to protect herself and her family, not to flee. The defense also contests the government's views on extradition from France and the UK.
Expert Opinion on French Extradition Law: 97-22
The document is an expert opinion by French attorney William Julié on the extradition procedure in France and the likelihood of Ghislaine Maxwell's extradition to the USA. It concludes that Maxwell's extradition is legally permissible and likely, given her US citizenship and irrevocable waiver of her right to contest extradition. The opinion addresses concerns raised during Maxwell's bail hearing in the US regarding her potential flight to France.
Court Order and attached letter from the Bureau of Prisons: 117
The document is a court order from Judge Alison J. Nathan, responding to a letter from the Bureau of Prisons requesting that the court vacate its previous order allowing Ghislaine Maxwell access to her government-provided laptop on weekends and holidays. The Bureau of Prisons argues that Maxwell has sufficient time to review discovery materials during the week and that the previous order should be vacated.
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.