Skip to content
Case File
d-36906House OversightFinancial Record

Civil suit alleges Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein in $100 M civil rights conspiracy case

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #029257
Pages
2
Persons
3

Summary

The filing names two high‑profile individuals (a former president and a deceased financier) as defendants in a massive $100 M civil rights conspiracy claim, which could merit further verification. How Plaintiff lists Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein as defendants. Claim seeks $100,000,000 in damages. Cause of action cited: 42 U.S.C. § 1985 – conspiracy to deny civil rights.

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Tags

financial-flowfinancial-damagesconspiracylawsuitlegal-exposurecivil-rightshouse-oversightcivil-rights-violationhighprofile-defendants
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Doe v. Trump et al – Civil docket filing for assault, libel & slander case

The document is a routine docket entry showing that a plaintiff filed a civil suit against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein. It contains no substantive allegations, evidence, financial transactions Case filed on 06/20/2016 in SDNY, assigned to Judge Ronnie Abrams. Plaintiff uses the pseudonym Jane Doe; represented by Thomas F. Meagher. Defendants listed: Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey E. Epstein.

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition excerpt of Alan Dershowitz in Jeffrey Epstein civil case (Oct 16, 2015)

The passage is a routine court transcript showing procedural details of a deposition. It mentions high‑profile individuals (Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein) but provides no substantive allegations, financ Deposition took place on Oct 16, 2015, at ~9:18 a.m. Alan M. Dershowitz was questioned by attorney Jack Scarola. The case involves plaintiffs represented by Seacy, Denney, Scarola and defendants incl

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Civil lawsuit filed by Jane Doe alleging assault, libel and slander against Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

The docket entry confirms a formal complaint linking Trump and Epstein to alleged assault and defamation, providing a concrete legal filing that could be a starting point for further investigation. Ho Complaint filed on 06/20/2016 in SDNY (Case #1:16‑cv‑04642‑RA) Plaintiff uses pseudonym "Jane Doe" and is represented by Thomas F. Meagher Defendants include Donald J. Trump and Jeffrey Epstein

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Civil Summons Served on Jeffrey Epstein and Associates in Miami-Dade County

The document is a standard civil summons notifying Jeffrey Epstein, Jean‑Luc Brunel, and Tyler McDonald of a lawsuit. While it confirms legal action against high‑profile individuals, the filing provid Summons issued by Eleventh Judicial Circuit Court, Miami‑Dade County, Florida. Defendants include Jeffrey Epstein, Jean‑Luc Brunel, and Tyler McDonald (doing business as YLORG). Plaintiff’s attorney

1p
House OversightDepositionNov 11, 2025

Deposition Transcript of Bradley J. Edwards in Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein Litigation (Palm Beach, FL)

The document provides a formal deposition record linking Jeffrey Epstein to a civil case against Scott Rothstein and other defendants, confirming the existence of litigation and identifying attorneys Deposition taken on March 23, 2010 in a case titled Jeffrey Epstein vs. Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Identifies plaintiff’s counsel Robert D. Critton, Jr. and defendant’s counsel Jack Alan Goldberger

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Attorney Bradley Edwards alleges Jeffrey Epstein's non‑prosecution agreement, 5th Amendment tactics, and a unique George Rush tape as key evidence ...

The affidavit details a non‑prosecution agreement that shielded Epstein from federal charges, claims that Epstein repeatedly invoked the Fifth Amendment to block discovery, and describes a purportedly Epstein secured a federal non‑prosecution agreement that barred criminal charges for ~30 victims in All co‑defendants and Epstein invoked the Fifth Amendment, leaving plaintiffs with no substantive

23p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.