Deposition excerpt showing contested attorney‑client privilege claims
Summary
The passage records a routine deposition dispute over privilege and mentions a lawyer (Jeffrey Herman) filing a lawsuit, but provides no concrete details about transactions, high‑level officials, or w Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of missing a hearing and obstructing the deposition. Reference to a lawyer named Jeffrey Herman filing a lawsuit on the witness’s behalf. Debate over whether attorney‑cli
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Courtroom exchange featuring Mr. Leopold and Mr. Tein with vague references to surveillance and name‑tag switching
The excerpt contains a disjointed transcript with no concrete names, dates, transactions, or actionable details. It hints at someone being searched for and a possible surveillance incident, but provid Witness mentions being aware that 'people were looking for me' without identifying who they were. Reference to a night when the witness and a friend 'switched name tags' – unclear relevance. Repeated
Transcript excerpt shows heated exchange over alleged witness coaching in House Oversight hearing
The passage only records procedural objections and accusations of coaching between counsel and a witness without naming any officials, transactions, or substantive allegations. It offers no actionable Mr. Leopold objects to repeated questioning and claims he has answered previously. Mr. Tein accuses Mr. Leopold of coaching the witness and attempts to stop him from speaking. The exchange occurs dur
Fragmented deposition transcript mentioning Mr. Leopold, Mr. Goldberger, and a photograph ID 18-001
The excerpt is heavily redacted and incoherent, offering no concrete names of high‑profile officials, specific transactions, dates, or actionable details. It merely records a brief exchange about a ph Mentions individuals named Mr. Leopold and Mr. Goldberger in a deposition context. Reference to a photograph labeled 18-001 and a subpoena served to the witness. Possible hint at a record‑keeping or
Privileged Discussion Over Potential $50M Lawsuit Against Jeffrey Epstein
The excerpt hints at a lawsuit filed by an individual named Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein for $50 million, but provides no concrete details such as filing dates, co Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion is framed as privileged, limiting disclosure of details. The witness and questioning attorney re
Witness refuses to confirm Leopold's $50M lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein citing privilege
The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to
Deposition excerpt featuring use of racial slur and exhibit identification dispute
The passage contains a contentious exchange over a racial slur during a deposition, but it mentions only low‑level participants (Mr. Leopold, Mr. Tein) and provides no concrete leads about financial f Witness uses the word "Niggaa" in response to a question. Counsel (Mr. Leopold) requests the word be spelled for the record. Dispute over whether the document is marked as an exhibit (exhibit 31-001)
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.