Testimony hints at possible witness intimidation and alleged misconduct by attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell
Summary
The passage suggests a potential effort to pressure a witness (Virginia Roberts) into naming a third party, implying possible unethical conduct by lawyers Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. However, th Witness claims she was pressured by her own lawyers to name a third party in pleadings. Allegations that attorneys Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell acted unethically and dishonestly. Possible intimid
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (3)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Witness claims to have knowledge of alleged Epstein‑related investigations and asserts no sexual misconduct, referencing Bradley Edwards, Paul Cass...
The passage provides a potential lead that a witness (likely a former associate of Jeffrey Epstein) claims to possess privileged information about investigations by high‑profile private investigators Witness asserts they never had sexual contact with Virginia Roberts or any underage girls. Claims knowledge of what investigators Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell gathered. References a letter from M
Palm Beach filings link former President Clinton to Epstein litigation and expose alleged fraud by Scott Rothstein’s firm
The passage provides concrete leads: names (Bill Clinton, Scott Rothstein, Bradley Edwards, Virginia Roberts, Paul Cassell), specific lawsuits, alleged racketeering claims, and a claim that Clinton’s Epstein sued Scott Rothstein’s firm and lawyer Bradley Edwards for racketeering, alleging they used Edwards countersued for malicious prosecution; the case remains pending. Virginia Roberts filed a
Allegations of Suborned Perjury Involving Judge Paul Cassell, Bradley Edwards, and Virginia Roberts
The passage hints at possible misconduct—suborning perjury—by a judge and a private investigator, with a third party (Virginia Roberts) allegedly pressured to make false statements. It provides some n Judge Paul Cassell and investigator Bradley Edwards are accused of encouraging false affidavits. Virginia Roberts allegedly pressured to include false allegations against an unnamed individual. Claim
Fragmented testimony about alleged unethical conduct and witness coordination
The excerpt contains vague references to an unethical act by Paul Cassell and mentions a potential witness (Virginia) but lacks concrete details, dates, transactions, or high‑level actors. It offers l Mentions Paul Cassell acting unethically Reference to a person named Virginia (last name Rob‑?) providing information Discussion of a phone call request to speak with a spouse (Rebecca) and possible
James Patterson claims false charges were fabricated by attorney Bradley Edwards and professor Paul Cassell, linking them to Scott Rothstein’s frau...
The passage provides a specific allegation that attorneys involved in the Epstein case fabricated charges, and it ties them to a known fraudster (Scott Rothstein). It names several high‑profile figure Patterson alleges that Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell fabricated false sexual assault charges agai He asserts that Cassell misused his former federal judge title and university affiliation to lend
Defendant Bradley Edwards files transcript of Virginia Roberts interview in Epstein civil case
The document is a routine notice of filing a transcript in a civil lawsuit. It does not reveal new allegations, financial flows, or connections to high‑level officials. The only potentially relevant n Bradley Edwards, a defendant, submitted a transcript of a phone interview with Virginia Roberts. The filing is part of a counter‑claim seeking punitive damages in the Jeffrey Epstein case. The notice
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.