Witness claims extortion attempts via website contact with Rebecca Roberts and unnamed associate
Summary
The passage provides a vague lead about possible extortion involving a person named Rebecca Roberts and references phone/email contact through a website, but lacks concrete details such as dates, amou Witness mentions multiple phone calls with Rebecca Roberts and a Michael, possibly linked to an exto No direct request for money was recalled, but the witness suggests the parties knew his contact in
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (4)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Witness testimony describes early 2005 bridge‑loan scheme that morphed into a Ponzi operation at a law firm
The passage provides a first‑hand account linking a law firm’s partners to a bridge‑loan/ Ponzi scheme beginning in 2005, naming several individuals (Stu Rosenfeldt, Susan Dolin, Michael Pancier) and Bridge loans started in 2005 and later evolved into a Ponzi scheme. The witness cites personal greed and the need to support a financially troubled law firm as motivati Partners named: Stu Rosenfeldt
Witness describes using alleged Epstein case files and flight manifest to convince investors of a fake settlement scheme, with former Florida Senat...
The passage provides a concrete, though unverified, link between a former high‑profile state official (Ken Jenne) and a purported Ponzi‑style scheme that leveraged the high‑profile Epstein case to att Witness claims to have shown investors a flight manifest from the Epstein case to lend credibility t Ken Jenne and unnamed associates allegedly delivered boxes of case files to the witness’s office d
Privileged Discussion Over Potential $50M Lawsuit Against Jeffrey Epstein
The excerpt hints at a lawsuit filed by an individual named Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein for $50 million, but provides no concrete details such as filing dates, co Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The discussion is framed as privileged, limiting disclosure of details. The witness and questioning attorney re
Witness refuses to confirm Leopold's $50M lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein citing privilege
The passage hints at a possible $50 million lawsuit filed by a Mr. Leopold on behalf of an unnamed party against Jeffrey Epstein, but provides no names, dates, court docket numbers, or corroborating d Mr. Leopold allegedly filed a federal lawsuit seeking $50 million from Jeffrey Epstein. The witness claims no knowledge of the lawsuit, invoking attorney‑client privilege. The questioning appears to
Deposition excerpts reference Jeffrey Epstein house staff, Prince Andrew, and Alan Dershowitz with vague admissions of visits and massages
The passage contains direct references to high‑profile individuals (Prince Andrew, Alan Dershowitz, Jeffrey Epstein) and suggests that house staff testimony may exonerate an unnamed witness. While the Witness acknowledges being named in sworn testimony of Epstein’s house staff. References to Prince Andrew’s presence at the house and frequent visits by Alan Dershowitz. Claims of regular massages be
Alleged FBI and Epstein contacts to a self‑identified victim, including threats from Epstein’s lawyer
The passage provides a concrete, though unverified, claim that a person claiming to be an FBI agent and a separate individual linked to Jeffrey Epstein both contacted the witness, suggesting possible Witness received a phone call from someone claiming to be an FBI agent. Shortly after, a second call allegedly from an Epstein associate warned the witness to stay silent. Epstein’s lawyer (unnamed,
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.