Letter from Kirkland & Ellis urging a de novo federal review of Jeffrey Epstein prosecution
Summary
The passage reveals internal legal strategy to challenge a federal prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein, cites a non‑prosecution agreement, and mentions a subpoena issued by Assistant U.S. Attorney Villafan Kirkland & Ellis argues the Department's prior review was limited and not de novo. Reference to a Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) that should have precluded further federal action. Assistant U.S. Att
This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.
View Source CollectionPersons Referenced (2)
Tags
Related Documents (6)
Allegations that Federal Grand Jury Subpoenas Violate Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement
The passage outlines a potential breach of a 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement (NPA) by the U.S. Attorney’s Office (USAO) and federal grand jury, suggesting a procedural misstep that could be pursued for Epstein entered a Non‑Prosecution Agreement on Sept. 24, 2007 with the USAO. The NPA stipulated that pending federal grand jury subpoenas would be held in abeyance unless the ag A new grand jury subp
Alleged Violation of 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement in Renewed Federal Grand Jury Investigation of Jeffrey Epstein
The passage outlines a claim that the Department of Justice and the U.S. Attorney’s Office reinstated a grand jury subpoena despite a 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement that should have protected Epstein September 24, 2007 Non‑Prosecution Agreement allegedly bars further federal prosecution of Epstein a A new grand jury subpoena in New York is claimed to violate that agreement. The document cites a D
Jeffrey Epstein Non‑Prosecution Deal and Victims’ CVRA Rights Challenge
The passage outlines a controversial non‑prosecution agreement (NPA) for Jeffrey Epstein that involved high‑level officials (U.S. Attorney Alexander Acosta) and raises legal questions under the Crime Epstein secured a non‑prosecution agreement after pressure on prosecutors, avoiding federal charges. Acosta, then U.S. Attorney, admitted a “year‑long assault on the prosecution” by Epstein. Victims
Allegations of Prosecutorial Misconduct in Federal Jeffrey Epstein Case
The passage alleges that senior U.S. Attorney Office staff (AUSA Weinstein, FAUSA Sloman, U.S. Attorney Acosta) disclosed case‑specific information and possibly offered financial inducements to witnes AUSA Weinstein allegedly disclosed plea‑negotiation details and warned a defense‑contact about media FAUSA Sloman reportedly sent non‑case‑specific information to defense, contradicting internal poli
Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta’s role in Jeffrey Epstein’s 2008 immunity deal
The passage identifies Acosta, then U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida and later Labor Secretary, as the architect of the controversial non‑prosecution agreement that granted Epstein immunity and a le Acosta negotiated a non‑prosecution agreement for Epstein while U.S. Attorney for Southern Florida. The deal allowed Epstein to plead guilty to state prostitution charges and receive a 13‑month jail
Federal prosecutors admit backing down on victim notifications in Jeffrey Epstein case after pressure from his attorneys
The passage reveals that U.S. Attorney’s Office officials altered victim‑notification procedures in 2013 due to objections from Epstein’s lawyers, suggesting possible prosecutorial misconduct and a co Federal prosecutors admitted in 2013 they altered victim‑notification obligations after pressure fro Former federal prosecutor Frances Hakes and Kenneth Staff are cited as having consulted with Epste
This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.