Skip to content
Case File
d-21881House OversightOther

Alleged Bannon–Flynn alliance and White House power dynamics during Trump transition

Date
November 11, 2025
Source
House Oversight
Reference
House Oversight #019962
Pages
1
Persons
3

Summary

The passage offers anecdotal claims about Steve Bannon’s role in managing Michael Flynn and securing a seat on the National Security Council, suggesting internal power plays within the Trump administr Bannon allegedly used Flynn’s controversial reputation to gain a seat on the National Security Counc Flynn is described as a “partisan” and “maniacal” figure who received flattery from Trump and was

This document is from the House Oversight Committee Releases.

View Source Collection

Persons Referenced (3)

Tags

steve-bannonmichael-flynnpolitical-influencepotential-financial-misconductwhite-house-transitioninternal-power-dynamicstrump-administrationnational-security-councilhouse-oversight
Share
PostReddit

Related Documents (6)

House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Steve Bannon met privately with Michael Moore during production of 'Fahrenheit 11/9'

The passage reveals a private two‑hour meeting between former White House strategist Steve Bannon and documentary filmmaker Michael Moore, suggesting potential insight into Bannon’s perspective on the Bannon was invited to appear on camera in Moore’s documentary but declined. He met with Moore for two hours off‑camera, influencing the film’s narrative. Bannon allegedly gave a terse explanation of

1p
House OversightFinancial RecordNov 11, 2025

Bannon‑Epstein email discussing dinner plans, vague political references and “coins”

The passage contains a casual exchange between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein with no concrete details, dates, or transactions. It mentions several names (Gerry Baker, a purported UN president, a ‘s Bannon and Epstein are communicating directly via email. Reference to a dinner invitation that may involve other unnamed individuals. Mentions of “michael and his coins” suggesting possible cryptocur

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Anecdotal recollections of Trump, Ailes, and Bannon discussing early cabinet appointments

The passage provides vague, unverified anecdotes about conversations among Trump allies regarding cabinet selections. It lacks concrete details such as dates, transactions, or actionable leads, offeri Steve Bannon reportedly discussed rapid confirmation timelines for cabinet nominees. Mentions of potential nominees: Rex Tillerson, Jeff Sessions, James Mattis, Michael Flynn, John Bolt Ailes charact

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Brief email hinting at decision on "taking" Michael Flynn and linking to Politico article on Acosta, Trump, and Epstein

The passage contains a vague reference to "take Flynn" without context, and a link to a publicly known Politico story about Alexander Acosta, Trump, and Jeffrey Epstein. It offers no concrete names, d Sender mentions needing to decide today whether to "take Flynn" – likely referring to Michael Flynn. Includes a Politico link about Alexander Acosta, Trump, and Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting a possible

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Email chain discussing firing Fed Chair Powell and targeting Jared Kushner & Ivanka Trump

The passage contains informal speculation by an unnamed sender to Steve Bannon about removing Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell and ousting Jared Kushner and Ivanka Trump. It offers no concrete evid Sender urges Trump to fire Fed Chair Jerome Powell after an interest‑rate hike. Mentions “Jared and Ivanka, need to go,” implying a desire to remove senior White House advisers. References a The Hill

1p
House OversightOtherNov 11, 2025

Steve Bannon forwards Alex Acosta “lenient sentence” claim about Jeffrey Epstein to a private contact

The passage links a senior Trump administration official (Secretary of Labor Alex Acosta) to a controversial plea deal for Jeffrey Epstein, suggesting possible misconduct and political protection. It Bannon circulated a Power Line article alleging Acosta gave Epstein a “sweetheart” plea deal. Claims that Epstein bought out a civil lawsuit to protect Acosta from public shaming. Mentions potential

1p

This document was digitized, indexed, and cross-referenced with 1,400+ persons in the Epstein files. 100% free, ad-free, and independent.